Table 2.
Association between pattern of visual field defect and RNFL thickness
| Pattern of VF defect | Number of patients | Polar RNFL loss (µm) in PCG group | Control RNFL thickness (µm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superior | |||||
| Nasal step | 6 | NI | TI | NI | TI |
| 96 (89-120) | 112 (87-127) | 119.26±24 (64-154) | 142±15.3 (112-170) | ||
| Arcuate | 2 | 89 (68,110) | 90 (66,114) | ||
| Inferior | |||||
| Nasal step | 2 | NS | TS | NS | TS |
| 32 (29,35) | 39 (39,39) | 120±17.2 (78-165) | 138.5±14.2 (112-161) | ||
| Arcuate | 1 | 100 | 103 | ||
| Double arcuate | 4 | NI+TI+NS+TS | NI+TI+NS+TS | ||
| 90±17.1 | 130±17.6 | ||||
| Advanced VF defect | 5 | Avg. RNFL | Avg. RNFL | ||
| 57.2±20.3 (43-93) | 100.63±7.2 (84-112) | ||||
VF, Visual field; RNFL, Retinal nerve fiber layer; NI, Nasal inferior; TI, Temporal inferior; NS, Nasal superior; TS, Temporal superior