Table 3.
Descriptive statistics of the variables used in the study (n = 241)
| Mean | Std | Scale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entrepreneurial networks | |||
| 1. Accountants | 1.51 | 0.97 | 1–5 |
| 2. Banking institutions | 1.49 | 0.90 | 1–5 |
| 3. Chamber of commerce | 1.12 | 0.53 | 1–5 |
| 4. Consultants | 1.85 | 1.21 | 1–5 |
| 5. Lawyers | 1.41 | 0.84 | 1–5 |
| 6. Regional business partner | 1.59 | 1.19 | 1–5 |
| 7. Patent advisers | 1.22 | 0.72 | 1–5 |
| 8. Venture capital firms | 1.18 | 0.70 | 1–5 |
| 9. Incubator network | 1.50 | 1.08 | 1–5 |
| Geographical proximity | |||
| 10. Proximity to university | 1.65 | 1.24 | 1–5 |
| 11. Proximity to customers | 2.74 | 1.54 | 1–5 |
| 12. Proximity to competitors in the same field | 1.48 | 0.94 | 1–5 |
| 13. Local/regional advantages | 1.80 | 1.22 | 1–5 |
| 14. Attractive/expansive industrial area | 2.28 | 1.42 | 1–5 |
| 15. Proximity to large, well-known firms | 2.14 | 1.46 | 1–5 |
| 16. Proximity to similar firms | 1.78 | 1.14 | 1–5 |
| Control variables | |||
| 17. Product or service | 4.01 | 1.30 | 1–5 |
| 18. Product/service differentiation | 3.00 | 1.25 | 1–5 |
| 19. Pricing | 2.81 | 0.91 | 1–5 |
| 20. Product/service quality | 3.91 | .080 | 1–5 |