Table 7.
Ordinal linear regression estimates [95% confidence interval] for association of mobility vs immobility with accelerated age assessed with Horvath, Hannum, Phenoage and DunedinPoAm for two comparisons.
| Model 1 | Horvath | Hannum | Phenoage | DunedinPoAm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Downward mobile group (reference: immobile socially advantage group) | − 0.17 [− 0.97, 0.63] | − 0.35 [− 0.94, 0.25] | 1.06 [− 0.03, 2.14] | 0.96*** [0.24, 1.68] |
| Model 2 | Horvath | Hannum | Phenoage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upward mobile group (reference: immobile socially disadvantage group) | 0.13 [− 0.37, 0.63] | 0.20 [− 0.21, 0.60] | − 0.65* [− 1.30, − 0.002] | − 0.96*** [− 1.47, − 0.46] |
Model 1; downward mobile group vs immobile socially advantaged group.
Model 2; upward mobile group vs immobile socially disadvantage group. All models also controlled sex, standardized age and standardized age squared.
95% confidence intervals in brackets.
*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.