Table 4.
What is the effectiveness of diet therapies on diarrhoea, abdominal pain, and flatulence? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Patients or population: adults with bile acid diarrhoea and chronic diarrhoea | ||||
Interventions: Carbohydrate intake modification, fat intake reduction optimised on medication; exclusive elemental (Vivonex) | ||||
Setting: Hospital outpatients for carbohydrate intake modification, fat intake reduction; inpatients for exclusive elemental | ||||
Outcome | Direction of effect | Number of participants | Certainty of the evidence | Comments |
ROB across studies | (studies) | GRADE | ||
Carbohydrate intake modification on diarrhoea |
Positive Serious |
2 (1 cohort study) |
⊕◯◯◯ |
Data in primary BAD only. Long‐term evaluation made (one study, clinician‐reported) but in two patients only. No validated tool used to assess diarrhoea |
Fat intake reduction on diarrhoea |
Positive Serious |
181 (5 cohort studies) |
⊕◯◯◯ |
Data in secondary BAD, cancer survivors only. Large sample size (one study). Data on sex, age and weight/BMI (two studies). Validated method used to assess diarrhoea (two studies). Longer‐term evaluation made (one study, patient‐reported). Long‐term evaluation made (one study, clinician‐reported) |
Exclusive elemental diet therapy on diarrhoea |
Positive Serious |
9 (2 cohort studies) |
⊕◯◯◯ |
Data in secondary BAD, Type 1 BAD/BAM only. No validated tool used to assess diarrhoea |
Fat intake reduction on abdominal pain |
Positive Serious |
122 (2 cohort studies) |
⊕◯◯◯ |
Data in secondary BAD, cancer survivors only. No validated tool used to assess abdominal pain |
Fat intake reduction on flatulence |
Positive Serious |
122 (2 cohort studies) |
⊕◯◯◯ |
Data in secondary BAD, cancer survivors only. No validated tool used to assess flatulence |
Adverse effects |
‐ Serious |
192 (8 cohort studies) |
⊕◯◯◯ Very Lowe |
Laxatives: allowed (2 studies), unclear (6 studies). Anti‐diarrhoeals: allowed (3 studies), unclear (5 studies) |
Abbreviations: BAD, bile acid diarrhoea; BAM, bile acid malabsorption; BMI, body mass index; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation; ROB, risk of bias.
Inconsistency: narrative synthesis conducted, no estimates of the therapy effect possible.
Indirectness: diarrhoea or abdominal pain or flatulence was measured differently across studies, unvalidated tools were used.
Imprecision: population samples were too small to generate precise results.
Inconsistency: differing end‐points across studies to measure therapy effect.
No studies reported on adverse effects.