Skip to main content
. 2022 May 5;78(12):2609–2630. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23370

Table 7.

Internal consistency for the DTS‐SF and DTS subscales across groups

DTS Total DTS Tolerance DTS Appraisal DTS Absorption DTS Regulation DTS‐SF
Sample α ω α ω α ω α ω α ω α ω
Total sample 0.92 0.92 0.78 0.79 0.86 0.86 0.82 0.82 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.82
Normal subgroup 0.90 0.90 0.75 0.75 0.82 0.83 0.77 0.77 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.78
Mild subgroup 0.91 0.91 0.76 0.76 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.79 0.72 0.77 0.79 0.80
Moderate subgroup 0.89 0.89 0.72 0.73 0.81 0.81 0.72 0.73 0.74 0.77 0.77 0.78
Severe+ subgroup 0.91 0.91 0.80 0.82 0.80 0.80 0.82 0.82 0.76 0.78 0.76 0.77

Note: Subgroups based on self‐reported depressive symptoms; normal n = 505, mild n = 125, moderate n = 194, severe+ n = 135, total N = 959.

Abbreviations: CFA, confirmatory factor analyse; CI, confidence interval; DTS, Distress Tolerance Scale; DTS‐SF, Distress Tolerance Scale short‐form.