Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;13:1079468. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1079468

TABLE 1.

Distribution of fake crackles in each location.

Location The number of fake crackles audio recordings N = 500
Have (%) No (%)
T 5 (8.93%) 51 (91.07%)
R1 4 (7.14%) 52 (92.86%)
R2 4 (7.27%) 51 (92.73%)
R3 13 (23.21%) 43 (76.79%)
R4 6 (10.71%) 50 (89.29%)
L1 7 (12.96%) 47 (87.04%)
L2 4 (7.27%) 51 (92.73%)
L3 12 (21.43%) 44 (78.57%)
L4 6 (10.71%) 50 (89.29%)
Total 61 (12.20%) 439 (87.80%)