Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;3(2):100259. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100259

Table 2.

Models Performance Disclosed by Retinal Imaging Type and OCTA Scanning Protocol (n = 726)

Task Data Models FR OCT OCTA (All) OCTA (3 × 3 SCP) OCTA (3 × 3 DCP) OCTA (6 × 6 SCP) OCTA (6 × 6 DCP) FR + OCT + OCTA
DM diagnosis Images LR 0.63 (0.08) 0.82 (0.03) 0.74 (0.04) 0.70 (0.06) 0.63 (0.05) 0.67 (0.06) 0.65 (0.06) 0.87 (0.03)
LDA 0.64 (0.10) 0.82 (0.04) 0.74 (0.06) 0.71 (0.04) 0.64 (0.05) 0.67 (0.04) 0.66 (0.04) 0.87 (0.03)
SVC-Linear 0.53 (0.07) 0.67 (0.08) 0.64 (0.09) 0.59 (0.05) 0.53 (0.06) 0.62 (0.08) 0.50 (0.08) 0.85 (0.03)
SVC-rbf 0.57 (0.06) 0.78 (0.04) 0.66 (0.04) 0.65 (0.05) 0.59 (0.10) 0.53 (0.13) 0.55 (0.08) 0.86 (0.03)
RF 0.65 (0.07) 0.78 (0.04) 0.66 (0.05) 0.62 (0.06) 0.58 (0.07) 0.58 (0.05) 0.61 (0.05) 0.86 (0.05)
+ clinical variables LR 0.67 (0.08) 0.86 (0.03) 0.78 (0.04) 0.77 (0.05) 0.71 (0.06) 0.72 (0.05) 0.74 (0.05) 0.89 (0.03)
LDA 0.67 (0.06) 0.86 (0.03) 0.77 (0.05) 0.76 (0.06) 0.73 (0.04) 0.72 (0.05) 0.75 (0.05) 0.89 (0.04)
SVC-Linear 0.57 (0.09) 0.79 (0.07) 0.77 (0.04) 0.69 (0.09) 0.61 (0.05) 0.69 (0.09) 0.56 (0.08) 0.88 (0.03)
SVC-rbf 0.66 (0.06) 0.85 (0.05) 0.76 (0.06) 0.69 (0.06) 0.66 (0.04) 0.69 (0.06) 0.68 (0.04) 0.87 (0.04)
RF 0.67 (0.05) 0.86 (0.03) 0.70 (0.06) 0.72 (0.04) 0.66 (0.05) 0.65 (0.06) 0.72 (0.05) 0.87 (0.05)
DR diagnosis Images LR 0.56 (0.09) 0.54 (0.03) 0.77 (0.03) 0.76 (0.04) 0.73 (0.03) 0.69 (0.06) 0.74 (0.04) 0.77 (0.02)
LDA 0.55 (0.07) 0.54 (0.04) 0.77 (0.04) 0.76 (0.04) 0.74 (0.03) 0.70 (0.08) 0.73 (0.04) 0.77 (0.03)
SVC-Linear 0.47 (0.07) 0.50 (0.05) 0.77 (0.04) 0.77 (0.05) 0.74 (0.03) 0.68 (0.06) 0.73 (0.04) 0.77 (0.03)
SVC-rbf 0.49 (0.09) 0.49 (0.05) 0.78 (0.03) 0.77 (0.04) 0.73 (0.02) 0.70 (0.07) 0.73 (0.03) 0.77 (0.03)
RF 0.54 (0.04) 0.47 (0.03) 0.75 (0.03) 0.72 (0.05) 0.71 (0.03) 0.63 (0.06) 0.69 (0.05) 0.76 (0.04)
+ clinical variables LR 0.78 (0.04) 0.78 (0.04) 0.82 (0.04) 0.81 (0.04) 0.80 (0.03) 0.79 (0.05) 0.80 (0.05) 0.81 (0.04)
LDA 0.78 (0.04) 0.78 (0.04) 0.82 (0.03) 0.82 (0.04) 0.80 (0.04) 0.79 (0.05) 0.79 (0.05) 0.82 (0.03)
SVC-Linear 0.77 (0.04) 0.77 (0.04) 0.82 (0.04) 0.81 (0.04) 0.80 (0.04) 0.79 (0.05) 0.80 (0.05) 0.81 (0.05)
SVC-rbf 0.77 (0.04) 0.78 (0.04) 0.82 (0.04) 0.81 (0.05) 0.80 (0.04) 0.79 (0.05) 0.80 (0.04) 0.81 (0.04)
RF 0.74 (0.03) 0.77 (0.04) 0.81 (0.04) 0.80 (0.05) 0.79 (0.04) 0.79 (0.05) 0.80 (0.06) 0.81 (0.04)
Referable DR diagnosis Images LR 0.42 (0.18) 0.60 (0.11) 0.87 (0.12) 0.83 (0.15) 0.86 (0.08) 0.74 (0.18) 0.82 (0.11) 0.87 (0.10)
LDA 0.55 (0.19) 0.45 (0.11) 0.87 (0.08) 0.86 (0.11) 0.86 (0.10) 0.70 (0.20) 0.80 (0.13) 0.87 (0.08)
SVC-Linear 0.49 (0.19) 0.49 (0.13) 0.85 (0.10) 0.76 (0.14) 0.73 (0.14) 0.76 (0.14) 0.83 (0.09) 0.83 (0.08)
SVC-rbf 0.52 (0.20) 0.58 (0.11) 0.73 (0.11) 0.70 (0.18) 0.77 (0.09) 0.69 (0.14) 0.77 (0.10) 0.73 (0.13)
RF 0.57 (0.12) 0.53 (0.12) 0.77 (0.08) 0.79 (0.08) 0.83 (0.07) 0.71 (0.10) 0.72 (0.10) 0.73 (0.09)
+ clinical variables LR 0.82 (0.11) 0.82 (0.11) 0.92 (0.02) 0.89 (0.08) 0.90 (0.03) 0.84 (0.09) 0.90 (0.03) 0.92 (0.02)
LDA 0.75 (0.14) 0.81 (0.10) 0.91 (0.06) 0.90 (0.06) 0.90 (0.04) 0.87 (0.04) 0.88 (0.06) 0.87 (0.07)
SVC-Linear 0.74 (0.14) 0.66 (0.08) 0.90 (0.04) 0.86 (0.05) 0.84 (0.07) 0.76 (0.10) 0.79 (0.11) 0.85 (0.06)
SVC-rbf 0.70 (0.16) 0.63 (0.11) 0.91 (0.05) 0.88 (0.06) 0.86 (0.06) 0.70 (0.13) 0.83 (0.07) 0.89 (0.04)
RF 0.68 (0.10) 0.74 (0.10) 0.79 (0.08) 0.84 (0.08) 0.87 (0.06) 0.78 (0.10) 0.70 (0.10) 0.79 (0.07)

Models performance described by mean area under the curve [AUC] (standard deviation).

DCP = deep capillary plexus; DM = diabetes mellitus; DR = diabetic retinopathy; FR = fundus retinography; LR = logistic regression; LDA = linear discriminant analysis; OCTA = OCT angiography; rbf = radial basis function; RF = random forest; SCP = superficial capillary plexus; SVC = support vector classifier.

The greatest AUCs by model and single image type.

Combination of all retinal images techniques.