Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 26;159:105372. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105372

Table 1.

MPXV PCR Ct value results generated on different indicated specimen types per study participant (every row represents a single patient, n = 25) with indication of oral lesion presence. (nd stands for not detected)

Patient # Plasma Oropharyngeal swab Saliva Oral lesions
1 35.54 26.77 30.94 No
2 37.72 nd 41.08 No
3 34.84 39.07 36.71 Yes (lip)
4 38.87 37.94 33.85 No
5 33.44 nd 37.05 No
6 37.51 25.54 25.71 Yes (lip)
7 39.90 32.66 33.61 Yes (lip)
8 38.41 35.98 23.85 No
9 37.54 33.86 25.15 No
10 nd nd nd No
11 32.74 34.98 29.13 No
12 nd nd nd No
13 39.16 nd 22.76 No
14 40.58 36.39 30.23 No
15 37.27 37.02 28.23 Yes (sublingual)
16 nd nd 37.51 No
17 36.60 36.12 35.17 No
18 36.11 nd 37.32 No
19 39.77 31.09 25.43 No
20 35.41 nd 29.90 No
21 34.77 37.61 nd No
22 36.59 31.76 23.02 No
23 35.83 35.16 25.64 Yes (lip)
24 nd 36.14 31.03 yes (lip)
25 nd nd 31.11 No
# positives (out of n = 25): 20
16 22
Sensitivity: 0.80
(0.61 to 0.91)
0.64
(0.45 to 0.80)
0.88
(0.70 to 0.96)
McNemar P value vs plasma: 0.2207 vs plasma: 0.6171
vs oropharyngeal swab: 0,0771