Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;6(24):6263–6270. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008095

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis for predictors of NIH lung response



Univariable
Multivariable
Clinical variable OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Belumosudil dose 200 mg QD vs 200 mg BID 1.67 0.49 5.62 .41
400 mg QD vs 200 mg BID 1.42 0.27 7.52 .68
Age <50 vs ≥50 0.90 0.30 2.69 .85
Sex Male vs female 7.22 1.81 28.8 .005 14.07 2.36 83.70 .0037
HLA donor match Partially matched vs matched 2.31 0.42 12.7 .34
Response to last systemic therapy PR vs no PR 4.36 1.11 17.2 .036 7.89 1.31 47.71 .024
Conditioning intensity MAC vs NMA 3.14 0.62 16.0 .17
NIH severity at enrollment Moderate vs severe 3.23 0.84 12.40 .088 2.80 0.50 15.79 .24
Number of organs involved at enrollment ≥4 vs <4 1.68 0.50 5.61 .4
NIH lung score at enrollment 1 vs (2 or 3) 5.67 1.63 19.70 .006 5.65 1.35 29.60 .028
Time from cGVHD to enrollment in months <24 vs ≥24 0.73 0.24 2.19 .57
<36 vs ≥36 1.35 0.44 4.13 .6

BID, twice daily; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; NMA, nonmyeloablative; OR, odds ratio; QD, daily