Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;54:101754. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101754

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

Cumulative fraction of cervical cancer cases averted after HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening – among all women and among WLHIV: Age-standardized fraction of cumulative cervical cancer cases averted over time since 2020 following girls' vaccination only (Sc1), girls' vaccination + 1 lifetime cervical screen (Sc2), girls' vaccination + 2 lifetime cervical screen (Sc3) in panels A–B, F-G, and Sc1 + vaccination of young WLHIV (Sc4), Sc3+ 3-yearly screening of WLHIV (Sc4), or Sc3 + vaccination and 3-yearly screening of WLHIV (sc6) in panels C–E, H-J. Results are presented among all women (A–E) and among WLHIV (F–J). The relevant scenarios are compared to basecase (A, C, F, H), girls' vaccination alone (B, D, G, I), and girls' vaccination plus 2 lifetime cervical screens (E, J). The numbers represent the median of the three models. The error bars represent the minimum and maximum of the three models. Vaccine coverage = 90%, Vaccine efficacy = 100% against HPV-16/18/31/33/45/52/58, Vaccine duration = Lifetime; Screening = HPV testing, Screening uptake = 45% (2023–2029), 70% (2030–2044), 90% (2045+). Treatment efficacy = 100%, Lost to follow-up = 10%. Scenarios are as described in Table 1.