. 2022 Dec 14;42(50):9450–9472. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0562-22.2022

Table 3.

Statistical comparisons from Figure 3

	Control line	Experimental line	Test	F_(df), p	p
A	elav>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	elav>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	Two-way ANOVA, Sidak's	F_(1,48) = 5.33 p = 0.03	0.05
A	MHC>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	MHC>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+		F_(1,48) = 5.33 p = 0.03	0.57 (ns)
B	elav>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	elav>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+		F_(1,48) = 7.38 p = 0.009	<0.0001
B	MHC>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	MHC>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+		F_(1,48) = 7.38 p = 0.009	0.37 (ns)
C	elav>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	elav>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+		F_(1,48) = 9.67 p = 0.003	<0.0001
C	MHC>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	MHC>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+		F_(1,48) = 9.67 p = 0.003	0.06 (ns)
D	elav>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	elav>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+		F_(1,48) = 22.01 p < 0.0001	<0.0001
D	MHC>GFP^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+	MHC>NF1^RNAi/+;Dicer2/+		F_(1,48) = 22.01 p < 0.0001	0.02
G	elav/+;;NF1^P1/+	elav>UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1	One-way ANOVA, Tukey's	F_(4,60) = 1.79 p = 0.14	n/a
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1/+
	elav/+;;NF1^P1
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1
H	elav/+;;NF1^P1/+	elav>UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1		F_(4,60) = 20.95 p < 0.0001	>0.99 (ns)
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1/+				0.94 (ns)
	elav/+;;NF1^P1				<0.0001
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1				<0.0001
I	elav/+;;NF1^P1/+	elav>UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1		F_(4,60) = 15.01 p < 0.0001	0.99 (ns)
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1/+				0.92 (ns)
	elav/+;;NF1^P1				0.0004
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1				<0.0001
J	elav/+;;NF1^P1/+	elav>UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1		F_(4,60) = 16.65 p < 0.0001	>0.99 (ns)
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1/+				0.99 (ns)
	elav/+;;NF1^P1				0.002
	UAS-NF1/+;NF1^P1				<0.0001

The p value in the rightmost column refers to that of the post hoc test following the (one-way or two-way) ANOVA. Where the p value of the ANOVA was not significant (G), no post hoc p value is given. df = degrees of freedom. ns = not significant.