Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;13:1046497. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1046497

TABLE 2.

Performance of transient elastography in patients with NAFLD.

Authors Year Sample size Mean BMI (kg/m2) Failure rate (%) F3-F4 (%) Cut-offs value AUROC Se Sp
Yoneda et al 2008 97 26.6 4.9 28 8.2 0.90 85 81
Nobili et al 2008 50 25.7 3.8 20 7 0.94 100 100
Wong et al 2010 246 28.5% > 30 10.2 23 8.7 0.93 84 83
Lupsor et al 2010 65 28.7 9.7 7 7.5 0.98 100 96
Petta et al 2011 146 29.1 14 14 8.75 0.87 76 78
Gaia et al 2011 72 27.5 8 34 8.0 0.76 65 80
Myers et al 2012 75 30.0 16(M) 28 7.8 (M) 0.87(M) 84(M) 79(M)
1.1 (XL) 6.4 (XL) 0.90 (XL) 81 (XL) 66 (XL)
Wong et al 2012 193 28.9 25 30 7.2 (XL) 0.78(ITT) 0.85(PP) 74(ITT)/78(PP) 78(ITT)/78(PP)
Kumar et al 2013 120 26.1 14.9 23 9.0 0.94 85 88
Mahadeva et al 2013 131 32.8% > 30 8 22 7.1 0.77 70 67
Aykut et al 2014 88 30.3 NA 41 7.9 0.94 96 90
Naveau et al 2014 100 42.3 19 9 7.6 0.85 100 74
Petta et al 2015 324 39.5% > 30 NA 35 10.1 0.86 78 78
Chan et al 2015 153 29.4 3.9 21 8.0 NA 95 66
Cassinotto et al 2016 291 60.1% > 30 23.4 43 8.2/12.5 0.86 90/57 61/90
Imajo et al 2016 142 28.1 10.5 32 11.4 0.88 86 84
Tapper et al 2016 164 32.3 27 18 9.9 0.93 95 77
Boursier et al 2016 588 31.7 9.3 39 8.7 0.83 88 63
Chen et al 2017 111 40.3 22.7 20 7.6 0.87 84 64
Park et al 2017 104 30.4 6.7 17 7.3 0.8 78 78

AUROC, area under ROC, curve; CC, correctly classified: true positive and true negative; NAFLD, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NA, not available; Se = sensitivity; Sp = specificity; ITT; intention to treat.