Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 2;3(6):276–288. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.10.005

Table 6.

Comparison with existing machine learning models on benchmark Cleveland ischemic heart disease dataset

Models Accuracy
RBF kernel-based SVM14 82.18%
Fuzzy rule-based model15 84.00%
Logistic regression SVM16 84.85%
Hybrid random forest17 88.40%
Ensemble model18 90.00%
Neural network with hyper-parameter optimization19 90.78%
Our clinical knowledge–enhanced ML model 94.40%

ML = machine learning; RBF = radial basis function; SVM = support vector machine.