Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;76(5):1438–1451. doi: 10.1002/hep.32540

TABLE 2.

Association between BW and NAFLD in men and women, using multiple logistic regression

Men (n = 23,780) β coefficient Model 0 β coefficient Model 1 β coefficient Model 2
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
BW (kg) 0.84 0.0008 0.53 0.0444 0.51 0.0506
BW2 (kg2) 0.13 0.0005 0.08 0.042 0.08 0.0446
Age (years) 0.05 1.05 (1.05–1.06) <0.0001 0.05 1.05 (1.05–1.06) <0.0001
Education level (ISCED‐2011) <0.0001 <0.0001
≤4 0 1 (Ref) 0 1 (Ref)
Between 5 and 6 0.31 0.73 (0.66–0.80) 0.27 0.76 (0.69–0.83)
≥7 0.82 0.44 (0.41–0.48) 0.73 0.48 (0.44–0.52)
Leisure physical activity
Never 0 1 (Ref) <0.0001
<2 h a week 0.54 0.58 (0.53–0.64)
2 h a week 0.94 0.39 (0.36–0.43)
Nutrition score (unit = 1) 0.01 0.99 (0.99–1.00) 0.06
Women (n = 31,254) β coefficient Model 0 β coefficient Model 1 β coefficient Model 2
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
BW (kg) 1.27 <0.0001 0.97 0.0031 0.99 0.003
BW2 (kg2) 0.22 <0.0001 0.16 0.0017 0.17 0.001
Age (years) 0.03 1.03 (1.03–1.04) <0.0001 0.04 1.04 (1.03–1.04) <0.0001
Education level (ISCED‐2011) <0.0001 <0.0001
≤4 0 1 (Ref) 0 1 (Ref)
Between 5 and 6 0.48 0.62 (0.56–0.69) 0.42 0.66 (0.59–0.74)
≥7 1.08 0.34 (0.30–0.38) 0.99 0.37 (0.33–0.42)
Leisure physical activity <0.0001
Never 0 1 (Ref)
<2 h a week 0.63 0.53 (0.48–0.60)
2 h a week 1.02 0.36 (0.32–0.42)
Nutrition score (unit = 1) 0 1 (0.99–1.01) 0.46

Model 0: crude association. Model 1: Model 0 + adjustment for age and education level (ISCED). Model 2: Model 1 + adjustment for nutrition score and leisure physical activity. Only beta coefficients are given for BW, as there are two terms for this variable in the model.