TABLE 1.
Taluk‐level bird family species richness | Coefficient | 95% credible interval | WAIC |
---|---|---|---|
Ardeidae | |||
Model 1 | |||
Ardeid species richness | 0.161 | 0.051 to 0.272 | 567.16 |
Model 2 | |||
Ardeid species richness | 0.482 | 0.161 to 0.819 | 567.39 |
(Ardeid species richness)2 | −0.025 | −0.050 to −0.002 | |
Anatidae | |||
Model 1 | |||
Anatid species richness | 0.039 | −0.046 to 0.123 | 571.92 |
Model 2 | |||
Anatid species richness | −0.117 | −0.390 to 0.169 | 571.13 |
(Anatid species richness)2 | 0.009 | −0.007 to 0.024 | |
Rallidae | |||
Model 1 | |||
Rallid species richness | 0.111 | −0.081 to 0.306 | 568.65 |
Model 2 | |||
Rallid species richness | −0.251 | −0.771 to 0.296 | 569.29 |
(Rallid species richness)2 | 0.041 | −0.016 to 0.096 | |
All waterbirds | |||
Model 1 | |||
Total species richness | 0.070 | 0.012 to 0.127 | 569.70 |
Model 2 | |||
Total species richness | 0.492 | 0.161 to 0.865 | 563.57 |
(Total species richness)2 | −0.011 | −0.021 to −0.003 |
Note: Within‐family species richness were all adjusted for the biotic constraints of sympatric species using the SESAM framework and fit with two competing models: For each family, Model 1 comprises only within‐family species richness and Model 2 comprises within‐family species richness and a quadratic term for within‐family species richness. Model fit was assessed using the Watanabe–Akaike information criterion (WAIC)