TABLE 2.
References | Intervention | N | Dose | Duration (weeks) | Tolerability | Discontinuation rate (acceptability) | Efficacy comparison (RC vs. non‐RC) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antipsychotics | |||||||
Tohen et al., 2006 |
Olanzapine Placebo |
119 60 |
5–20 mg | 48 |
8% discontinued due to AE e 0% discontinued due to AE e |
32% e 13% e |
NS |
Baldessarini et al. 2003 a |
Olanzapine Placebo |
44 46 |
M: 15 mg — |
3–4 |
57% of RC experienced SAE NR |
38% e (RC 57% in 12 m) 62% e |
Mostly NS. RC > NRC some ST; NRC > RC some LT d |
Sanger et al. 2003 a |
Olanzapine Placebo |
19 26 |
5–20 mg — |
3 |
0% discontinued due to AE 0% discontinued due to AE |
21% 54% |
n/a |
Suppes et al. 2014 |
Quetiapine Placebo |
36 38 |
300 mg — |
8 |
88% experienced an AE e 67% experienced an AE e |
38% e 31% e |
NS |
Cutler et al. 2011 |
Quetiapine Placebo |
45 52 |
M: 604 mg — |
3 |
3% discontinued due to AE e 8% discontinued due to AE e |
28% e 28% e |
NRC > RC mania interaction |
Vieta et al. 2007 a |
Quetiapine Placebo |
42/31 35 |
300/600 mg — |
8 |
15/24% discontinued due to AE 8% discontinued due to AE |
36/48% 38% |
NS |
Thase et al. 2006 |
Quetiapine Placebo |
44/46 53 |
300/600 mg — |
8 |
8/11% discontinued due to AE e 1% discontinued due to AE e |
41/47% e 35% e |
NS |
Muzina et al. 2008 a |
Aripiprazole Placebo |
14 14 |
M: 24 mg — |
100 |
7% experienced an AE 0% experienced an AE |
79% 100% |
n/a |
Suppes et al. 2008b a |
Aripiprazole Placebo |
52 51 |
M: 28 mg — |
3 |
10% discontinued due to AE e 9% discontinued due to AE e |
52% e 63% e |
NS |
Bobo et al. 2011 |
Risperidone LAI TAU |
20 25 |
M: 27 mg Optimised |
52 |
MC: 20% basal ganglia, 15% sedation, 10% + weight MC: 24% basal ganglia, 16% sedation, 12% + weight |
20% 24% |
n/a |
Mood stabilisers | |||||||
Kemp et al. 2012 |
Lamotrigine Placebo |
23 26 |
150‐200 mg | 12 |
4% ‐ pruritis/benign rash 4% ‐ pruritis |
17% 15% |
n/a |
Wang et al. 2010 |
Lamotrigine Placebo |
18 18 |
150‐200 mg | 12 |
MC: 22% tremor, 11% nausea, 6% headache MC: 39% tremor, 33% headache, 11% diarrhoea |
55% 55% |
n/a |
Suppes et al. 2008 b |
Lamotrigine Lithium |
34 34 |
M: 250 mg M: 1200 mg |
16 |
M(SD): 4.2 ± 3.2 e M(SD): 9.2 ± 6.4 e |
49% e 61% e |
NS |
Calabrese et al. 2000 a |
Lamotrigine Placebo |
90 87 |
M: 288 mg — |
26 |
67% experienced an AE 68% experienced an AE |
59% 74% |
n/a |
Goldsmith et al. 2003 |
Lamotrigine Placebo |
66 68 |
50‐400 mg | 32 |
85% experienced an AE 78% experienced an AE |
40% 42% |
n/a |
Walden et al. 2000 |
Lithium Lamotrigine |
7 7 |
M: 0.84 mmol/L M: 425 mg |
52 |
43% weight gain, 29% slight tremor 43% dizziness, 29% headache |
0% 0% |
n/a |
Antidepressants | |||||||
Ghaemi et al. 2021 |
Citalopram Placebo |
14 19 |
M: 27 mg — |
52 |
35% experienced an AE e 37% experienced an AE e |
77% e 80% e |
NRC > RC mania interaction |
Parker et al. 2006 |
Escitalopram Placebo |
6 4 c |
10 mg — |
26 |
0% discontinued due to AE 0% discontinued due to AE |
0% 0% |
n/a |
Post et al. 2006 a |
Bupropion Sertraline Venlafaxine |
21 12 14 |
M: 286 mg M: 195 mg M: 192 mg |
10 |
0% discontinued due to an AE e 7% discontinued due to an AE e 3% discontinued due to an AE e |
31% e 41% e 45% e |
RC bupropion > venlafaxine mania/NRC treatment NS |
Other classes | |||||||
Walshaw et al. 2018 |
Levothyroxine T3 Placebo |
13 10 9 |
= > index 4.5–7.5 = > serum 0.65–1.36 — |
12–48 |
0% discontinued due to an AE 10% discontinued due to an AE 0% discontinued due to an AE |
19% 0% 0% |
n/a |
Keck et al. 2006 |
Ethyl‐EPA Placebo |
31 28 |
6 g |
17 |
5% experienced an SAE e 5% experienced an SAE e |
54% e | NR |
Lenz et al. 2016 |
CPT Bibliotherapy |
7 9 |
14 × 90‐min weekly 3 × 90‐min group |
14 (<14 m FU) | NR |
10% 23% |
NR |
Multiple Classes | |||||||
Amsterdam et al. 2017 a |
Venlafaxine Lithium |
17 7 |
37.5‐375 mg 300‐1200 mg |
12 | NR |
59% 22% |
NS |
Amsterdam et al. 2013 |
Fluoxetine Lithium Placebo |
8 9 8 |
10‐40 mg 300‐1200 mg — |
50 |
0% discontinued due to AE 0% discontinued due to AE 13% discontinued due to AE |
50% 89% 88% |
NS |
Amsterdam et al. 2009 |
Venlafaxine Lithium |
12 15 |
37.5‐ 375 mg 300‐2100 mg |
12 | 16% discontinued due to AE | 40% e | RC > NRC across arms |
Suppes et al. 2005 a |
Olanzapine Divalproex |
76 68 |
M: 16 mg M: 1530 mg |
47 |
MC: 18% + weight, 20% rhinitis, 7% edema MC: 17% + weight |
85% e 84% e |
NRC > RC across arms |
Tohen et al. 2003 |
Olanzapine Placebo OFC |
132 127 34 |
5‐20 mg ‐ 6 + 25/6 + 50/12 + 50 mg |
8 |
9% discontinued due to AE e 5% discontinued due to AE e 2% discontinued due to AE e |
52% e 62% e 36% e |
NRC > RC depression interaction (not stat. tested) |
Langosch et al. 2008 |
Quetiapine Na Valproate |
21 16 |
M: 465 mg M: 1340 mg |
52 |
86% experienced an AE 63% experienced an AE |
63% 60% |
n/a |
McElroy et al. 2010 |
Quetiapine Paroxetine Placebo |
81 24 24 |
300/600 mg 20 mg — |
8 |
11% discontinued due to AE e 13% discontinued due to AE e 8% discontinued due to AE e |
35% 38% 40% |
NRC quetiapine > placebo/RC NS |
Abbreviations: =>, titrated to; AE, adverse event; CPT, cognitive psychoeducational therapy; ethyl‐EPA, ethyl‐eicosapentanoate; FU, follow‐up; LAI, long‐acting injectable; LT, long‐term; M, mean/median; MC, most common; n, number of patients; NR, not reported; NRC, non‐rapid cycling; NS, not significant; RC, rapid cycling; SAE, serious adverse event; ST, short‐term; T3, triiodothyronine; TAU, treatment as usual; URI, upper respiratory infection.
Multiple papers per study, & in some cases multiple studies reported per article (see Supplement 2).
Data extracted from the whole study sample as most participants had RC and/or where no difference between RC and NRC was reported.
Reports data across all treatment groups.
Vieta et al. reported similar mania improvements in the short‐term between RC and non‐RC participants, but a higher proportion of RC patients responded in the 3–4 week blinded trial, and responded more quickly than non‐RC patients (across olanzapine and placebo arms). However, in the long‐term (1 year open label olanzapine treatment), although parity of several outcomes was reported between these subgroups, better outcomes were identified for non‐RC versus RC participants in: remission/recovery rates, time to recovery, number of episodes, rehospitalisation and suicide rates, and tolerability difficulties.
Describes data covering the overall study group as separate results for RC participants were not reported.