Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;24(5):683–695. doi: 10.1111/cid.13115

TABLE 3.

Comparison of cumulative abutment fracture rate according to different factors, and hazard ratio estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazard models at 9 years

Factors Univariate
HR (95% CI) p‐value
Gender
Male 1 0.047*
Female 0.217 (0.048 ~ 0981)
Age
Step by one 1.007 (0.968 1.048) 0.724
Arch
Maxillary 1 0.211
Mandible 2.120 (0.653 ~ 6.886)
Position
Anterior <0.001 (<0.001 ~ 107300) 0.967
Premolar 0.251 (0.033 ~ 1.932) 0.184
Molar 1
Type of prosthesis
ISC 1 0.016*
IFPD 0.156 (0.035 ~ 0.705)
Cantilever
Yes 0.048 (<0.001 ~ 292 939.886)
No 1 0.703
Abutment design
Indexed (/X) 5.855 (1.566 ~ 21.893) 0.009*
Without indexed (C/) 1
Abutment angulation
Yes 0.863 (0.189 ~ 3.938) 0.849
No 1
Opposing jaw
Natural tooth 26.347 (<0.001 ~ 44 68 485.545) 0.594
Implant crown 1.000 (<0.001 ~ 14 70 558.607) 1.000
Others 1
Length
8 mm 1
9.5 mm 0.075 (0.008 ~ 0.679) 0.021
11 mm 0.264 (0.079 0.885) 0.031
14 mm <0.001 (<0.001 ~ −) 0.980
Diameter
3.5 mm 0.196 (0.054 ~ 0.714) 0.013*
4.5 mm 1
Bone graft
Yes 0.218 (0.028 ~ 1.676) 0.143
No 1

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

*

p < 0.05.