Analytical Cross‐Sectional Study |
1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? |
[1, 2, 5‐7] |
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? |
3. Was the exposure measure in a valid and reliable way? |
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? |
5. Were confounding factors identified? |
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? |
7. Were the outcomes measure in a valid and reliable way? |
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
Cohort Study |
1.Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? |
[4] |
|
2. Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? |
|
|
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? |
|
|
4. Were confounding factors identified? |
|
|
5. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? |
|
|
6. Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? |
|
|
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? |
|
|
8. Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcome to occur? |
|
|
9. Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? |
|
|
10. Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilised? |
|
|
11. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
|
Case series |
1. Were there clear criteria for inclusion in the case series? |
[3, 8] |
2. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants included in the case series? |
3. Were valid methods used for identification of the condition for all participants included in the case series? |
4. Did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants? |
Did the case series have complete inclusion of participants? |
5. Was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the study? |
6. Was there clear reporting of clinical information of the participants? |
7. Were outcomes or follow up results of cases clearly reported? |
8. Was there clear reporting of the presenting site(s)/clinic(s) demographic information? |
9. Was statistical analysis appropriate? |