TABLE 7.
Effects of support utilization and self-control between parenting styles and SPA and IGD (n = 3,049).
Total effect | Indirect effect (self-control) |
Indirect effect (support utilization) |
Sequential indirect effect (support utilization→self-control) | Direct effect | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
β | P | 95% CI | β | P | 95% CI | β | P | 95% CI | β | P | 95% CI | β | P | 95% CI | |
SPA | |||||||||||||||
MC | –0.291 | <0.001 | [–0.406 –0.175] | –0.109 | <0.001 | [–0.164 –0.054] | –0.018 | 0.070 | [–0.038 0.001] | –0.053 | <0.001 | [–0.070 –0.037] | –0.110 | 0.031 | [–0.211 –0.010] |
MEA | 0.258 | 0.007 | [0.072 0.443] | 0.156 | <0.001 | [0.074 0.237] | 0.006 | 0.240 | [–0.004 0.016] | 0.017 | 0.085 | [–0.002 0.037] | 0.079 | 0.334 | [–0.081 0.238] |
MO | 0.476 | <0.001 | [0.279 0.673] | 0.210 | <0.001 | [0.122 0.298.] | 0.008 | 0.158 | [–0.003 0.020] | 0.024 | 0.021 | [0.004 0.045] | 0.233 | 0.006 | [0.068 0.399] |
FC | –0.171 | 0.001 | [–0.275 –0.068] | –0.109 | <0.001 | [–0.158 –0.060] | –0.014 | 0.071 | [–0.028 0.001] | –0.040 | <0.001 | [–0.054 –0.025] | –0.009 | 0.855 | [–0.102. 0.085] |
FEA | 0.226 | 0.011 | [0.052 0.399] | 0.131 | 0.001 | [0.054 0.208] | 0.017 | 0.078 | [–0.002 0.036] | 0.050 | <0.001 | [0.029 0.071] | 0.029 | 0.709 | [–0.121 0.178] |
FO | 0.219 | 0.018 | [0.038. 0.401] | –0.012 | 0.757 | [–0.090 0.066] | –0.004 | 0.323 | [–0.013 0.004] | –0.012 | 0.196 | [–0.031 0.006] | 0.248 | 0.002 | [0.094 0.402] |
IGD | |||||||||||||||
MC | –0.061 | <0.001 | [–0.082 –0.040] | –0.010 | <0.001 | [–0.016 –0.005] | 0.001 | 0.738 | [–0.003 0.004] | –0.005 | <0.001 | [–0.007 –0.003] | –0.046 | <0.001 | [–0.067 –0.026] |
MEA | –0.023 | 0.153 | [–0.055 0.009] | 0.015 | <0.001 | [0.007 0.023] | <0.001 | 0.773 | [–0.002 0.001] | 0.002 | 0.086 | [–0.001 0.003] | –0.039 | 0.014 | [–0.071 –0.008] |
MO | 0.030 | 0.082 | [–0.004 0.064] | 0.020 | <0.001 | [0.011 0.029] | <0.001 | 0.756 | [–0.002 0.002] | 0.002 | 0.023 | [0.001 0.004] | 0.008 | 0.616 | [–0.025 0.042] |
FC | –0.010 | 0.298 | [–0.028 0.009] | –0.010 | <0.001 | [–0.015 –0.005] | 0.001 | 0.741 | [–0.002 0.003] | –0.004 | <0.001 | [–0.005 –0.002] | 0.004 | 0.677 | [–0.014 0.022] |
FEA | –0.023 | 0.128 | [–0.054 0.007] | 0.012 | 0.002 | [0.005 0.020] | –0.001 | 0.742 | [–0.004 0.003] | 0.005 | <0.001 | [0.003 0.007] | –0.040 | 0.009 | [–0.070 –0.010] |
FO | 0.087 | <0.001 | [0.056 0.118] | –0.001 | 0.758 | [–0.009 0.006] | <0.001 | 0.792 | [–0.001 0.001] | –0.001 | 0.200 | [–0.003 0.001] | 0.089 | <0.001 | [0.058 0.120] |
The effects were tested by using the bootstrap method with 5,000 resamples. MC, mother’s care; MEA, mother’s encouragement of autonomy; MO, mother’s overprotection; FC, father’s care; FEA, father’s encouragement of autonomy; FO, father’s overprotection.