Abstract
Background:
Previous research has shown that a majority of adolescents in the United States initiate and drink alcohol prior to graduating high school and nearly twenty percent of high school seniors engage in heavy episodic drinking. Despite anecdotal evidence and media portrayals of alcohol use during high school events (e.g., prom), little is understood about alcohol use surrounding specific events that may be identified as “high-risk” events and addressed in specific interventions. Similarly, normative perceptions exert powerful influence on behaviors but little is understood about normative perceptions of alcohol use at high school events.
Objectives:
The purpose of the present study was to understand whether high school alcohol use is associated with specific events by describing behaviors and normative perceptions.
Methods:
Participants were 386 U.S. college students age 18 to 19 (60.4% female, mean age = 18.4) who provided retrospective accounts of their alcohol use surrounding senior year high school events (either before, which is relevant to pregaming addressed in this special issue, during, or after).
Results:
Most students did not drink surrounding high school events but nearly all reported that they perceived that the typical high school senior did. Those who did drink alcohol tended to drink heavily, particularly during prom. Alcohol use was associated with other high school events ranging from the beginning of senior year (e.g., Homecoming) though the end (e.g., graduation parties).
Conclusions:
Results indicate the importance of future research efforts tailoring intervention efforts around specific events and the applicability of personalized normative feedback approaches.
Keywords: event-specific drinking, high school, descriptive norms, adolescence, alcohol
Introduction
Over 60% of adolescents in the United States report drinking alcohol prior to leaving high school (Johnston et al., 2020a) and 14% of U.S. 12th graders consumed 5+ drinks at least once in the past two weeks (Patrick & Terry-McElrath, 2019). White students and males have historically been at greater risk for alcohol use though differences based on sex have narrowed recently (Johnston et al., 2020b). Adolescent alcohol use is prevalent internationally as well with 56% of adolescents across 84 countries reporting lifetime alcohol use and 15% engaging in heavy episodic drinking (5+ drinks) in the past 30 days (Noel, 2019). Alcohol use can contribute to academic struggles, driving-related risks, health effects, and social/interpersonal impacts (Dupont, et al., 2013; HHS 2016, 2018; White & Hingson, 2013). While rates of alcohol use in U.S. high schools are well documented, less is known about circumstances and contexts wherein high school drinking occurs.
Researchers have studied event-specific drinking among college students on occasions such as 21st birthdays, spring break, campus-specific events, and holidays (e.g., Henslee et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2009; Lewis et al., 2009; Neighbors et al., 2011). A key component of event-specific drinking is pregaming, a risky practice typically involving drinking large quantities of alcohol in a compressed period before a specific event (DeJong et al., 2010). To date, however, event-specific drinking in U.S. high school students has not been well studied.1 Although pregaming does occur among U.S. high school students (e.g., Kenney et al., 2010; Zamboanga et al., 2011), and while the specific events for which students high school students pregame are less understood, evidence suggests high school prom is associated with pregaming (Zamboanga, et al., 2011). Thus, if the risk factors associated with alcohol use surrounding high-risk events, like prom, can be better understood, pregaming associated with these high-risk events can also be addressed. The present study extends event-specific drinking research to focus on retrospective reports of frequency and quantity of drinking as well as normative perceptions of drinking during specific high school events during senior year.
Social learning theory suggests perceptions of peer behaviors such as descriptive norms (e.g., perceived use of alcohol by others) exert powerful influences on personal alcohol use (Brown et al., 2008; Litt & Stock, 2011). Research has reliably demonstrated overestimation of alcohol use among peers, with the greatest misperceptions occurring for heavier drinkers (Baer et al., 1991; Neighbors et al., 2004; Pederson et al., 2017). Identification of drinking tied to anticipated, time-limited, specific events creates opportunity for tailored interventions with potential to reduce a disproportionate share of harms (Neighbors et al., 2007). Efficacious event specific prevention has been implemented in college populations to reduce alcohol use for 21st birthdays (Neighbors et al., 2009) and spring break (Lee et al., 2014). If high school drinking is similarly tied to specific events and these events are accompanied by an overestimation of drinking behaviors then event-specific intervention efforts applied to high school populations could prove useful in reducing alcohol-related harm.
The purpose of the present study was to identify events associated with alcohol use during senior year in high school, estimate actual prevalence and quantity of alcohol consumed at these events alongside perceived norms, and examine demographic differences in alcohol use and norms during these events. Because alcohol use is proscribed for this population, event-specific drinking was broadly defined as alcohol use before (pregaming), during, and after the event. The goal of this research was to determine whether specific high-risk events would be potential candidates for event specific prevention efforts with high school seniors. We therefore hypothesized that normative perceptions of others’ drinking at high school events will be higher than behavioral reports of actual drinking at these events.
Methods
Participants
Participants were 386 undergraduate students (Mage=18.4 [SD=.49], 60.4% female) from a large U.S. public university in the Pacific Northwest, drawn from a larger study focused on college student alcohol use. Participants were categorized as non-Hispanic Asian (41.5%), non-Hispanic White (37.6%), Hispanic (10.4%) and non-Hispanic Other (10.1%). The University IRB approved all procedures and a federal Certificate of Confidentiality was obtained from the National Institutes of Health.
Procedures
First or second year students were randomly selected from the university’s fall 2019 registrars list and invited by e-mail to complete a brief online survey (45.5% response rate). Students viewed the study information statement and, after consenting, were directed to a confidential online survey and compensated $10 for completion. Present analyses included students between 18-19 years old.
Measures
Demographic Information
Sex assigned at birth, Hispanic/Latino/a status, and racial identity were assessed by three separate items. Participants who identified as Hispanic/Latino/a were subsequently coded as Hispanic, across all races.
Alcohol Use
General alcohol use during senior year was assessed by two items: “During your senior year in high school, how often did you usually have any kind of drink containing alcohol?” (0=”Never” to 7= “Every Day”) and, “During your senior year in high school, how many alcoholic drinks did you have on a typical day when you drank alcohol?” (0 to 25 drinks). Participants were also asked whether they attended specific high school events during senior year including prom, homecoming dance, non-formal dances, graduation parties and sporting events; if they did attend they reported how much alcohol they drank (0 to 25 drinks) before (pregaming), during and after the event (as an event-wide total around the event; time frames were not separately assessed). This holistic approach to event specific drinking encompasses pre-loading (or pregaming), side-loading (drinking that occurs during specified event – on or off site), and back-loading (drinking after a specific event) described by Hughes and Devilly (2021). Finally, participants were asked to identify an “other” specific event, where they felt the typical high school senior drank the most; participants then indicated whether they attended the event and provided number of standard drinks they consumed the day of the event. Open-ended responses were coded independently by two raters and interrater agreement, assessed by Cohen’s κ was almost perfect, κ = .98.
Normative Perceptions
Descriptive normative perceptions of alcohol use were assessed by asking all participants to indicate number of drinks consumed by a “typical high school senior” (0 to 25 drinks) for each of the previously described events.
Results
Over one-third (36.5%) of the sample reported drinking at least once per month during their senior year in high school and 13.2% of the sample indicated they typically drank 5+ drinks when they drank alcohol.2
Alcohol use during high school specific events
More than three-quarters of participants reported attending prom (78.2%), a graduation party (75.6%) or a high school sporting event (78.0%), with over half reporting they attended non-formal dances (50.8%) and homecoming (60.9%). Day-of alcohol use associated with specific high school events was not the norm, with most attendees reporting they did not drink. However, the majority of participants perceived the typical senior did drink the day of these events. Among this sample, 33.8% of prom attendees reported drinking the day of the event, however, 94.0% of all participants believed the typical high school senior drank the day of prom. Among attendees of high school graduation parties, 30.2% reported drinking, yet 86.9% of participants estimated the typical high school senior consumed alcohol the day of these events. Similar gaps existed for other events between reported alcohol use and perceptions of drinking prevalence.3 For those who reported drinking the day of these events, average number of drinks ranged from 3.43 associated with sporting events to 5.38 associated with prom (see Table 1).
Table 1.
Number of standard drinks reported at high school events among those who both attended and drank at event
| All | Males | Females | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | M | 95% CI | N | M | 95% CI | N | M | 95% CI | |
| High School Event | |||||||||
| Prom | 102 | 5.38 | [4.72-6.04] | 41 | 6.39 | [5.23-7.55] | 61 | 4.70 | [3.94-5.47] |
| Graduation Party | 88 | 4.00 | [3.33-4.67] | 30 | 5.03 | [3.61-6.45] | 58 | 3.47 | [2.76-4.17] |
| Homecoming | 63 | 4.49 | [3.71-5.28] | 22 | 4.82 | [2.99-6.65] | 41 | 4.32 | [3.55-5.09] |
| Non-formal Dance | 53 | 4.19 | [3.41-4.96] | 21 | 4.86 | [3.52-6.19] | 32 | 3.75 | [2.78-4.72] |
| Sporting Events | 37 | 3.43 | [2.39-4.48] | 18 | 2.61 | [1.72-3.50] | 19 | 4.21 | [2.32-6.10] |
Note. Males reported drinking significantly more than females at prom and graduation parties, p < .05. “Drank at event” encompasses any preloading, side-loading, and back-loading.
Demographic differences in alcohol use during specific events
Table 2 displays prevalence of any drinking at high school events and percentage who believe the “typical senior” drank on the day of prom and graduation parties, broken down by demographics. Across all events and demographic groups, participants overestimated that the “typical” senior drank on the day of an event compared to actual self-reported drinking behavior. Significant differences in demographic groups are highlighted below.
Table 2.
Prevalence and perception of any alcohol use at senior year high school events
| Alcohol Use | Normative Perceptions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % Reported Drinking |
95% CI | N | % Perceived “Typical” Student Drank |
95% CI | |
| Prom | ||||||
| All | 302 | 33.8% | [28.4-39.1] | 384 | 94.0% | [91.6-96.4] |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 108 | 38.0% | [28.7-47.3] | 153 | 92.2% | [87.9-96.5] |
| Female | 194 | 31.4% | [24.9-38.0] | 231 | 95.2% | [92.5-98.0] |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 119 | 43.7%a | [34.7-52.7] | 145 | 95.2% | [91.6-98.7] |
| Asian | 121 | 24.79%b | [17.0-32.6] | 158 | 93.0% | [89.0-97.1] |
| Hispanic | 30 | 36.7%ab | [18.4-55.0] | 40 | 92.5% | [84.0-100] |
| Other | 31 | 29.0%ab | [12.1-46.0] | 39 | 97.4% | [92.3-100] |
| Graduation Party | ||||||
| All | 291 | 30.2% | [24.9-35.6] | 382 | 86.9% | [83.5-90.3] |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 116 | 25.9% | [17.8-34.0] | 151 | 88.7% | [83.6-93.8] |
| Female | 175 | 33.1% | [26.1-40.2] | 231 | 85.7% | [81.2-90.3] |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 116 | 31.0% | [22.5-39.6] | 145 | 82.07%a | [75.8-88.4] |
| Asian | 114 | 31.6% | [22.9-40.2] | 156 | 92.31%b | [88.1-96.5] |
| Hispanic | 33 | 36.4% | [19.0-53.7] | 40 | 82.5%ab | [70.2-94.9] |
| Other | 26 | 11.5% | [0.0-24.7] | 39 | 89.7%a b | [79.8-99.7] |
| Homecoming | ||||||
| All | 235 | 26.8% | [21.1-32.5] | 385 | 91.2% | [82.8-94.4] |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 81 | 27.2% | [17.3-37.1] | 153 | 89.5% | [84.6-94.5] |
| Female | 154 | 26.6% | [19.6-33.7] | 233 | 92.2% | [88.7-95.7] |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 100 | 34.0% | [24.6-43.5] | 145 | 94.5% | [90.7-98.2] |
| Asian | 84 | 19.1% | [10.5-27.6] | 159 | 88.1% | [83.0-93.2] |
| Hispanic | 27 | 37.0% | [17.6-56.5] | 40 | 92.5% | [84.0-100] |
| Other | 23 | 13.0% | [0.0-27.9] | 39 | 92.3% | [83.6-100] |
| Non-formal Dance | ||||||
| All | 196 | 27.0% | [20.8-33.3] | 382 | 85.1% | [81.5-88.7] |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 69 | 30.4% | [19.3-41.6] | 151 | 84.8% | [79.0-90.6] |
| Female | 127 | 25.2% | [17.5-32.9] | 231 | 85.3% | [80.7-89.9] |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 80 | 36.3% | [25.5-47.0] | 145 | 85.5% | [79.7-91.3] |
| Asian | 74 | 21.6% | [12.0-31.2] | 156 | 84.0% | [78.2-89.8] |
| Hispanic | 22 | 27.3% | [7.1-47.5] | 40 | 85.0% | [73.4-96.6] |
| Other | 19 | 10.5% | [0.0-25.7] | 39 | 89.7% | [79.8-99.7] |
| Sporting Events | ||||||
| All | 296 | 12.5% | [8.7-16.3] | 379 | 68.6% | [63.9-73.3] |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 119 | 15.1% | [8.6-21.7] | 150 | 68.7% | [61.2-76.2] |
| Female | 177 | 10.7% | [6.1-15.3] | 229 | 68.6% | [62.5-74.6] |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 119 | 20.17%a | [12.9-27.5] | 145 | 71.0% | [63.6-78.5] |
| Asian | 116 | 8.62%b | [3.4-13.8] | 153 | 67.3% | [59.8-74.8] |
| Hispanic | 34 | 8.8%abc | [0.0-18.9] | 40 | 60.0% | [44.1-75.9] |
| Other | 26 | 0.0%bc | - | 39 | 74.4% | [60.0-73.4] |
Note. Ns for alcohol use at events include all participants who indicated that they attended a particular event. All participants, regardless of event attendance, provided responses about normative perceptions of drinking at events.
Group differs significantly from type (in column) where b or c is indicated.
Prom.
Among those who attended prom, a main effect for drinking by race was found, F (3, 297) = 3.41, p<.05. Post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment indicated White students were significantly more likely to drink on the day of prom than Asian students (see Table 2). With respect to quantity, males who drank on the day of prom reported significantly more drinks than females, F (1, 100) = 6.48, p<.05 (see Table 1).
Graduation Party.
Prevalence of any drinking on the day of a graduation party did not differ by demographic group, however, among those who drank on the day of a graduation party, males reported a higher quantity than females, F (1, 86) = 5.06, p<.05 (see Table 1). A main effect for perceptions of typical student drinking by race was found, F(3, 376)=2.71, p<.05 with Asian and Other race students significantly more likely to report that a typical student drank during day of graduation party than were White students (p < .05).
Sporting Events.
A main effect for drinking by race was found for sporting events, F (3, 291)=4.15, p<.01 with White students reporting significantly high rates of drinking than either Asian or Other race students (p<.05).
Other High School Events.
Participants were asked to identify an event other than ones already discussed where the typical high school senior drinks the most. Most of the sample (86.0%, n=332) specified an event and these were coded into 20 different events. By far the most commonly reported event (45.8%) was “party.” Birthdays (8.1%), holidays (6.0%) senior day/events (5.7%), and hanging out/“kickbacks” (4.8%) rounded out the top five most commonly identified events. Participants who attended the specified event reported fewer drinks across all “other” events (M = 2.06 [95%CI: 1.62-2.50]) compared to perceptions of typical student drinking on the day of these events (M = 4.14 [95%CI: 3.83-4.44]).
Discussion
The present study sought to identify events associated with alcohol use during senior year in high school, examining both drinking behaviors and normative perceptions. Results indicate most students did not drink on the day of the specific high school events we examined. Even on prom day, during which the greatest number of students reported drinking, alcohol was consumed by only one-third of attendees. Yet, students consistently misperceived that the “typical” senior consumed alcohol on the day of these events when, in fact, the “typical” senior in our sample did not report drinking; this misperception presents an opportunity to implement normative feedback interventions. These results are consistent with findings on event-specific drinking in college student populations (e.g., Neighbors et al., 2009).
Alcohol use at prom receives considerable attention in the popular press, yet it has been largely unstudied by researchers. While most who attended high school events did not drink alcohol at them, those who did drink tended to drink heavily; this was particularly true of prom. Our results indicate heavy alcohol use was present at a number of school events ranging from the beginning of senior year (e.g., homecoming) through the end of the year (e.g., graduation), which may represent additional risks related to impaired driving or riding with an impaired driver.
Limitations
Results should be viewed in light of several limitations. First, the study relies upon retrospective accounts of behavior. While students were generally only about a year removed from the events in question, and the events examined represent significant social and developmental events that should improve recall (e.g., timeline follow-back; Sobel & Sobel, 1992), caution should be taken with respect to the accuracy of recall. Further, the estimate of perceived norms was relatively simple (i.e., estimating what the “typical student” did), and future studies could look more closely at actual estimates of prevalence as well as perceptions of behavior by a student of the same age, gender, and/or race/ethnicity. The present sample is limited to those who attended college in the Pacific Northwest and may not generalize to other regions or those who are not college-bound. The present sample contains a significant number of Asian American students, a group that often, as was the case in this study, reports lower rates of alcohol use (e.g., Terry-McElrath & Patrick, 2018). Finally, event-specific drinking was defined broadly to include drinking before, during and after events, so alcohol use before (or pre-gaming) could not be separately considered with these data. Future research should examine timing of drinking to better inform potential intervention efforts and understanding of pregaming versus during and after events.
Conclusion
While it is encouraging that most participants reported not drinking alcohol on the day of these high school events, the overwhelming majority perceived the “typical student” to drink. Prevention efforts addressing misperceived norms surrounding prom could reducing drinking prevalence and quantity around the event. Zamboanga et al. (2011) suggest part of drinking on the day of high school prom involves pregaming. If so, these prevention efforts could extend to reducing pregaming itself, although this would need to be further studied.. For those who make the choice to drink, future research could explore the utility of personalized normative feedback, already successful with high school students (e.g., Doumas et al., 2021), for event-specific prevention. For those who abstain, a positive community norms approach highlighting the choice of the majority (i.e., not drinking at these events), may increase the likelihood that high school students will maintain abstinence (Linkenbach, et al., 2020). These norms-based strategies could be implemented around traditionally high-risk times of year as a form of event-specific prevention, both to maintain the abstinence of those who do not drink and potentially change the behavior of those considering alcohol use.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Retrospective accounts of high school (HS) events indicated event specific drinking.
One-third of HS seniors drank before (pregaming), during, or after prom.
HS seniors misperceive that alcohol use was ubiquitous during specific events.
Personalized normative feedback interventions may successfully target HS events.
Funding:
This research was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse grant R01AA012547 (PI: M. Larimer) and T32AA007455 (PI: M. Larimer). Partial support for this research also came from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research infrastructure grant, P2C HD042828, to the Center for Studies in Demography & Ecology at the University of Washington.
Footnotes
Author Agreement
All authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript being submitted. Authors warrant that the article is the authors' original work, hasn't received prior publication and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Author CRediT Statement
Michael S. Gilson: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing- original draft, writing-reviewing and editing.
Jason R. Kilmer: Formal analysis, writing- original draft, writing- reviewing and editing.
Christine M. Lee: Conceptualization, writing- reviewing and editing.
Mary E. Larimer: Investigation, methodology, writing- reviewing and editing, funding acquisition.
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
International examples of high school event-specific drinking are well documented. For example, in Australia “schoolies week,” a time where recent high-school graduates gather to celebrate finishing school is associated with excessive alcohol use (Johnston, Byrne et al., 2020).
Further, 9.9% of the present sample indicated that they drank at least once per week during senior year in high school. In comparison, data from Monitoring the Future, a national sample, found that 29.3% of high school seniors drank during the past month and that 14.4% reported 5+ drinks during the past two weeks (Johnston et al., 2020a). The retrospective accounts of alcohol use in the current sample, therefore, appear fairly consistent with national data.
Supplemental analyses were conducted to examine normative perceptions of drinking by typical high school seniors. These analyses indicated that, for each event, normative perceptions were significantly higher among students who reported that they drank at the event compared to those who reported that they did not (see Supplemental Table 1).
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- Baer JS, Stacy A, & Larimer M (1991). Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(6), 580–586. 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown SA, McGue M, Maggs J, Schulenberg J, Hingson R, Swartrzwelder S, … Murphy S (2008). A developmental perspective on alcohol and youths 16 to 20 years of age. Pediatrics, 121, Supplement 4, S290–S310. 10.1542/peds.2007-2243D [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeJong W, DeRicco B, & Schneider SK (2010). Pregaming: An exploratory study of strategic drinking by college students in Pennsylvania. Journal of American College Health, 58(4), 307–316. 10.1080/07448480903380300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doumas DM, Esp S, Turrisi R, & Bond L (2021). A Randomized Controlled Trial of the eCHECKUP to GO for High School Seniors across the Academic Year. Substance Use & Misuse, 56(13), 1923–1932. 10.1080/10826084.2021.1958862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DuPont RL, Caldeira KM, DuPont HS, Vincent KB, Shea CL, & Arria AM (2013). America’s dropout crisis: The unrecognized connection to adolescent substance use. Rockville, MD: Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. Available at www.ibhinc.org, www.PreventTeenDrugUse.org, and www.cls.umd.edu/docs/AmerDropoutCrisis.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Henslee AM, Buckner JD, & Irons JG, (2015). The impact of campus traditions and event-specific drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 45, 180–183. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston AN, Byrne JH, Bost N, Aitken M, Wadham J, Donnelly T, … & Crilly J (2021). Longitudinal description and evaluation of an emergency department avoidance strategy for a youth mass gathering (Schoolies) in Australia. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 33(2), 270–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston LD, Miech RA, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, & Patrick ME (2020a). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2019: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. [Google Scholar]
- Johnston LD, Miech RA, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, & Patrick ME (2020b). Demographic subgroup trends among adolescents in the use of various licit and illicit drugs, 1975–2019 (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 94). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. [Google Scholar]
- Kenney SR, Hummer JF, & LaBrie JW (2010). An examination of prepartying and drinking game playing during high school and their impact on alcohol-related risk upon entrance into college. Journal of youth and adolescence, 39(9), 999–1011. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-009-9473-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee CM, Lewis MA, & Neighbors C (2009). Preliminary examination of spring break alcohol use and related consequences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 689–694. 10.1037/a0016482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis MA, Lindgren KP, Fossos N, Neighbors C, & Oster-Aaland L (2009). Examining the relationship between typical drinking behavior and 21st birthday drinking behavior among college students: Implications for event-specific prevention. Addiction, 104, 760–767. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02518.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linkenbach JW, Bengtson PL, Brandon JM, Fredrickson AJ, Kilmer JR, Lubbers DT, Ooms JD, Roche VS, & Thompson SJ (2020). Reduction of youth monthly alcohol use using the positive community norms approach. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, epub available 4/17/2020. 10.1007/s10560-020-00666-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Litt DM, & Stock ML (2011). Adolescent alcohol-related risk cognitions: The roles of social norms and social networking sites. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 708–713. 10.1037/a0024226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neighbors C, Atkins DC, Lewis MA, Lee CM, Kaysen D, & Mittmann A (2011). Event-specific drinking among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 702–707. 10.1037/a0024051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neighbors C, Larimer ME, & Lewis MA (2004). Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 434–447. 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neighbors C, Lee CM, Lewis MA, Fossos N, & Walter T (2009). Internet-based personalized feedback to reduce 21st-birthday drinking: A randomized controlled trial of an event-specific prevention intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(1), 51–63. 10.1037/a0014386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neighbors C, Walters ST, Lee CM, Vader AM, Vehige T, Szigethy T, & DeJong W (2007). Event-specific prevention: Addressing college student drinking during known windows of risk. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2667–2680. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noel JK (2019). Associations between alcohol policies and adolescent alcohol use: a pooled analysis of GSHS and ESPAD data. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 54(6), 639–646. 10.1093/alcalc/agz068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patrick ME, & Terry-McElrath YM (2019). Prevalence of high-intensity drinking from adolescence through young adulthood: National data from 2016-2017. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 13, 1–5. 10.1177/1178221818822976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pedersen ER, Osilla KC, Miles JN, Tucker JS, Ewing BA, Shih RA, & D’Amico EJ (2017). The role of perceived injunctive alcohol norms in adolescent drinking behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 67, 1–7. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sobell LC, & Sobell MB (1992). Timeline follow-back. In Measuring alcohol consumption (pp. 41–72). Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- Terry-McElrath YM, & Patrick ME (2018). US adolescent alcohol use by race/ethnicity: Consumption and perceived need to reduce/stop use. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 19(1), 3–27. 10.1080/15332640.2018.1433094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Surgeon General, Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. Washington, DC: HHS, November 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2018). Report to Congress on the Prevention and Reduction of Underage Drinking.
- White A, & Hingson R (2013). The burden of alcohol use: Excessive alcohol consumption and related consequences among college students. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 35, 201–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zamboanga BL, Borsari B, Ham LS, Olthuis JV, Van Tyne K, & Casner HG (2011). Pregaming in high school students: Relevance to risky drinking practices, alcohol cognitions, and the social drinking context. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(2), 340. 10.1037/a0022252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
