Table 1.
Comparison of extraction methods of CEP.
Method | Advantage | Disadvantage |
---|---|---|
Organic solvent extraction | Simple equipment, easy to implement, the most widely used. | Time-consuming, laborious and harmless. |
Ultrasound-assisted extraction | Simple and time-saving, low energy consumption, wide application. | It is easy to affect the consistency of CEP yield in different batches. |
Microwave-assisted extraction | The most time-saving, solvent saving. | It can induce undesirable structural modifications and is not conductive to large-scale production. |
Enzyme-assisted extraction | The conditions are mild, low temperature, high efficiency and reduction of equipment corrosion. | High cost, large amount of enzyme, and is not suitable for industrial scales |
Ultrasound-assisted extraction and aqueous two-phase | Advance extraction yields, environmentally-friendly, energy-saving. | Long phase separation time at aqueous two-phase step. |