Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Nov 21;75(1):28–40. doi: 10.1002/art.42316

Table 2:

Model performance characteristics

Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium (OABC) Discovery Cohort, Full models 707,077 CpGs available for modeling
Comparison groups Accuracy (mean±SEM) AUC-ROC (mean±SEM) Sensitivity (mean±SEM) Specificity (mean±SEM) Diagnostic odds ratio (mean±SEM) F1 score (mean±SEM) Number of features (CpGs) included (mean±SEM)
Radiographic-only vs. non-progressor 87±0.8% 0.94±0.004 0.88±0.01 0.88±0.01 83±12 0.78±0.01 17±2
Pain-only vs. non-progressor 89±0.9% 0.97±0.004 0.92±0.01 0.89±0.01 120±20 0.83±0.02 13±2
Dual- vs. non-progressor 72±0.7% 0.79±0.006 0.70±0.01 0.74±0.01 7.4±0.4 0.74±0.01 7±2
Any (pain/radiographic/dual) vs. non-progressor 78±0.4% 0.86±0.004 0.78±0.004 0.78±0.01 15±1.0 0.85±0.003 14±2
Radiographic-only vs. pain-only 58±1% 0.62±0.01 0.54±0.02 0.60±0.01 2.2±0.2 0.51±0.02 14±3
Dual- vs. radiographic-only progressor 76±0.6% 0.82±0.007 0.78±0.06 0.72±0.03 12±1.3 0.86±0.003 10±2
Dual- vs. pain-only progressor 71±0.6% 0.79±0.007 0.74±0.006 0.76±0.03 7.8±0.7 0.84±0.003 5±1
OABC Discovery Cohort, parsimonious models 13 CpGs available for modeling
Radiographic-only vs. non-progressor 89±0.5% 0.94±0.003 0.83±0.01 0.91±0.004 77±11 0.81±0.01 n/a
Pain-only vs. non-progressor 90±0.7% 0.95±0.004 0.88±0.01 0.92±0.01 125±21 0.86±0.01 n/a
Dual- vs. non-progressor 76±0.6% 0.85±0.006 0.75±0.01 0.78±0.01 12±0.8 0.77±0.01 n/a
Any (pain/radiographic/dual) vs. non-progressor 82±0.3% 0.89±0.003 0.84±0.004 0.78±0.008 20±1.0 0.87±0.002 n/a
Applying OABC-developed parsimonious models to other independent datasets:
JoCoOA:
Radiographic-only vs. non-progressor:
80±0.3% 0.88±0.003 0.78±0.004 0.88±0.004 28±1 0.86±0.002 n/a
Previous OAI dataset:
Radiographic-only vs. non-progressor:
80±0.8% 0.89±0.002 0.80±0.008 0.82±0.01 20±1.4 0.80±0.005 n/a