Table 1.
Monitoring method A |
Monitoring method B |
||||||||||
Study | Method | Confidencea (%) | Frequency (%) | Subscore | Method | Confidence (%) | Frequency (%) | Subscore | Raw score (%) | Normal score (%) | Adherence-assurance rating |
Garbutt et al., 2005b | Extended release | 3 | 100 | 300 | – | – | – | – | 300 | 100 | High |
Kranzler et al., 2004c | Extended release | 3 | 100 | 300 | – | – | – | – | 300 | 100 | High |
Oslinetal., 1997 | Direct supervision | 3 | 100 | 300 | – | – | – | – | 300 | 100 | High |
Krystal et al., 2001 | 6β-naltrexol (plasma) | 3 | 1 | 3 | MEMS caps | 2 | 99 | 198 | 201 | 67 | Medium |
O'Malley et al., 2003 (Trial 2) | MEMS caps | 2 | 100 | 200 | – | – | – | – | 200 | 67 | Medium |
O'Malley et al., 2003 (Trial 3) | MEMS caps | 2 | 100 | 200 | – | – | – | – | 200 | 67 | Medium |
Petrakis et al., 2005 | MEMS caps | 2 | 100 | 200 | – | – | – | – | 200 | 67 | Medium |
Guardia et al., 2002 | Intermittent direct supervision | 3 | 43 | 129 | Pill counts | 1 | 57 | 57 | 186 | 62 | Medium |
Monti et al., 2001 | Riboflavin | 2 | 10 | 20 | Pill counts | 1 | 90 | 90 | 110 | 37 | Low |
Chick et al., 2000 | 6β-naltrexol (urine) | 3 | N.R. | Unknown | Pill counts | 1 | 100–N.R. | <100 | >100 | >33 | Low |
Gastpar et al., 2002 | 6β-naltrexol (urine) | 3 | N.R. | Unknown | Pill counts | 1 | 100–N.R. | <100 | >100 | >33 | Low |
Anton et al., 2006 | Blister packs | 1 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | 100 | 33 | Low |
Balldin et al., 2003 | Pill counts | 1 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | 100 | 33 | Low |
Kiefer et al.,2003 | Pill counts | 1 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | 100 | 33 | Low |
Monterosso et al., 2001 | Blister packs | 1 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | 100 | 33 | Low |
Morley et al., 2006 | Pill counts | 1 | 100 | 100 | Self-report | 1 | N.R. | 0 | 100 | 33 | Low |
Morris et al., 2001 | Pill counts | 1 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | 100 | 33 | Low |
Petrakis et al., 2004 | Pill counts | 1 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | 100 | 33 | Low |
Volpicelli et al., 1997 | Pill counts | 1 | 100 | 100 | Self-report | 1 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 33 | Low |
Schmitz et al., 2004 | Direct supervision | 3 | 24 | 72 | Riboflavin | 2 | N.R. | Unknown | >72 | >24 | Low |
Anton etal., 1999 | Riboflavin | 2 | 14 | 28 | – | – | – | – | 28 | 9 | Low |
O'Malley et al., 1992 | Riboflavin | 2 | 7 | 14 | – | – | – | – | 14 | 5 | Low |
Notes: N.R. = not reported.
Confidence: 1 = low (self-report, pill counts, blister packs); 2 = medium (MEMS [Medication Event Monitoring System], riboflavin testing); 3 = high (supervision, extended-release formulation);
Garbutt et al. (2005) used the extended-release formulation developed by Alkermes, Inc., Cambridge, MA;
Kranzler et al. (2004) used the extended-release formulation developed by DrugAbuse Sciences, Inc., Hayward, CA.