Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 29;21:228. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01697-4

Table 2.

Analysis of risk factors for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS)

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
SOST × menopause status 2.59 (1.80–3.73)  < 0.001 2.12 (1.46–3.08)  < 0.001
T stage 0.660 0.917
 T2 vs. T1 1.02 (0.71–1.46) 0.926 1.00 (0.68–1.47) 0.988
 T3 vs. T1 1.44 (0.65–3.21) 0.374 1.19 (0.51–2.79) 0.696
N stage 4.38 (3.16–6.06)  < 0.001 4.15 (2.94–5.88)  < 0.001
ER × PR 0.60 (0.43–0.83) 0.002 0.54 (0.35–0.82) 0.004
HER2 0.99 (0.72–1.38) 0.969 0.66 (0.38–1.16) 0.150
Ki67 0.98 (0.71–1.34) 0.877 0.98 (0.69–1.39 0.895
Molecular type 0.910 0.331
 HR + HER2 + 
 vs. HR + HER2- 0.90 (0.59–1.38) 0.645 0.68 (0.43–1.08) 0.103
 HR-HER2 + 
 vs. HR + HER2- 1.09 (0.70–1.69) 0.706 0.66 (0.38–1.16) 0.150
 TNBC
 vs. HR + HER2- 0.96 (0.60–1.56) 0.879 0.82 (0.45–1.48) 0.503

DMFS Distant metastasis-free survival, HR Hormone receptor, CI Confidence interval, ER Estrogen receptor, PR Progesterone receptor, HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TNBC Triple-negative breast cancer. × represents joint analysis