Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 15;7(51):47851–47860. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05642

Table 6. Computed EP Times (t1 and t2) from the Nonlinear Regressions Using the eWf and the TCa.

endpoint time / s
experiment empirical W-function,teWf theoretical curve, tTC(t) Applied Precision, AP % difference
initial titration
1 179.11 177.71 178.78 –0.78
2 228.47 226.64 230.1 –0.80
3 167.52 165.93 166.99 –0.95
4 160.42 158.01 159.91 –1.50
5 218.86 217.57 218.31 –0.59
6 169.82 166.51 170.04 –1.94
7 252.77 250.09 252.35 –1.06
8 231.09 229.44 230.46 –0.71
9 79.87 77.71 79.24 –2.70
10 101.54 100.14 101.32 –1.37
final titration
1 62.17 61.64 61.89 –0.88
2 62.44 61.28 62.31 –1.86
3 58.51 58.38 58.43 –1.92
4 59.21 58.02 59.18 –2.02
5 59.41 58.43 59.35 –1.65
6 62.74 61.58 62.68 –1.85
7 62.33 61.10 62.26 –1.98
8 61.59 60.57 61.50 –1.66
9 59.83 58.71 59.72 –1.88
10 59.56 58.51 59.44 –1.77
a

The EP times given by the software of the Applied Precision instrument (AP) are also given as a reference value. The percentage of difference (% difference) is calculated with respect to the value obtained with the eWf as 100*(tTC(t)teWf)/teWf.