Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 8;28(12):2573–2583. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02126-1

Fig. 3. Subgroup analyses of PFS (FAS).

Fig. 3

HRs (center square) with 95% CIs (error bars) for PFS in the atezo-chemo group versus the placebo-chemo group in the FAS. HRs with CIs were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards method. The number of patients in each subgroup/arm is indicated. Intrinsic subtype, PD-L1 status, TIS, tumor lymphocyte infiltration and TMB were not available for all patients.