Table 2.
Case control | Durmus et al. (30) | Lygidakis et al. (23) | Beentjes et al. (34) | Ahmadi et al. (24) | Ghanim et al. (36) | Muratbegovic et al. (38) | Whatling and Fearne (39) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection | |||||||
1) Is the case definition adequate? | * | * | – | * | * | * | * |
2) Representativeness of the cases | * | * | – | * | * | * | * |
3) Selection of controls | * | * | – | – | * | * | * |
4) Definition of controls | * | * | – | * | * | * | * |
Comparability | |||||||
1) Comparability of cases and controls on the casis of the design or analysis | ** | ** | * | * | * | ** | ** |
Exposure | |||||||
1) Ascertainment of exposure | * | * | – | * | * | * | - |
2) Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | * | * | – | * | * | * | * |
3) Non-response rate | – | * | – | – | * | * | * |
The * and ** symbols indicate score that each article received in the quality assessment.