Table 5.
Pros and cons of different IGA systems.
| Instrument | Pros | Cons | Current manufacturers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure mat | Less setup time, easy to operate | High cost, non-portable, restricted to over-ground trials, require specific operational space | Tekscan Inc. (Walkway, F-Mat), Novel Electronics Inc. (EMED) |
| Pressure insole | Portable, cost-effective, does not require specific operational space, useful for indoor and outdoor setup | Low accuracy compared to pressure mat | Tekscan Inc (F-Scan), Novel Electronics Inc. (Pedar) |
| Motion capture | Highly accurate, useful for complex tasks involving motion in multiple planes | High cost, non-portable, additional time requirements for initial setup and calibration, special training required for operating the system, restrictions to indoor setup | Northern Digital Inc. (Optotrak), Qualisys (Arqus, Miqus), Vicon Motion Systems Ltd (VCON), BTS S.p.A. (Elite, SMART-DX) |
| Wearable sensors | Low cost, does not require specific operational space, useful for indoor and outdoor setup, less setup and calibration time | Special algorithms required to combine multiple sensor data | Xsens (MTW), Shimmer Sensing (Shimmer3 IMU), GaitUp SA (Physilog) |