Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 30;20:493. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02696-4

Table 4.

Comparison of clinical characteristics between the MPR group and the non-MPR group

Non-MPR MPR P
Patients 16 (44.4%) 20 (55.6%)
Age 66.5 (62.0–68.0) 60.5 (54.5–67.8) 0.147
Sex
 Male 12 (75.0%) 16 (80.0%)
 Female 4 (25.0%) 4 (20.0%) 1.000
Smoking history
 No 6 (37.5%) 6 (30.0%)
 Yes 10 (62.5%) 14 (70.0%) 0.729
Treatment cycles
 2 8 (50.0%) 10 (50.0%)
 3 6 (37.5%) 4 (20.0%)
 4 2 (12.5%) 6 (30.0%) 0.321
Adverse effect
 No 0 2 (10.0%)
 Grades 1–2 13 (81.2%) 12 (60.0%)
 Grades 3–5 3 (18.8%) 6 (30.0%) 0.184
Pre-treatment PD-L1 expression
 Negative 6 (37.5%) 2 (10.0%)
 Positive 2 (12.5%) 8 (40.0%)
 Unknown 8 (50.0%) 6 (30.0%) 0.054
Pathology
 Squamous cell carcinoma 8 (50.0%) 11 (55.0%)
 Adenocarcinoma 5 (31.3%) 4 (20.0%)
 Non-small-cell lung cancer 3 (18.8%) 5 (25.0%) 0.724
Clinical stage
 IIB 1 (6.3%) 3 (15.0%)
 IIIA 13 (81.2%) 7 (35.0%)
 IIIB 2 (12.5%) 7 (35.0%)
 IIIC 0 3 (15.0%) 0.023
Radiological response
 CR 0 8 (40.0%)
 PR 12 (75.0%) 12 (60.0%)
 SD 4 (25.0%) 0 <0.001

MPR major pathologic response, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD-L1 programmed cell death ligand 1