Skip to main content
. 2001 Mar;69(3):1298–1305. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1298-1305.2001

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Strain Characteristics (reference) T84 cell response to infection
Barrier function (% change in resistance vs control)a A/E lesionb IL-8 (ng/ml)c
E2348/69 Parental EPEC, Adh+ Inv+ (26) −78 ± 0.2 + 54 ± 6.8
CVD206 E2348/69 ΔeaeA, Adh+ intimate Adh Inv (10) −12 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.82
CVD452 E2348/69 ΔescN::aphA-3, signal transduction affected (20) +6 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.49
a

TER was monitored on filter-grown T84 cells as described in Materials and Methods. Values presented correspond to resistance measured after 6 h of infection. 

b

Estimated after 3 h of infection by staining with FITC-phalloidin. 

c

Estimated in cell supernatant from 6-h-infected cells by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described in Materials and Methods.