Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 23;3(1):otab007. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otab007

Table 3.

Association Between the Full Mayo, pMayo, and mMayo Score With Clinical or PROs

Mayo pMayo mMayo
Physician-reported outcome
 Current flaring, n = 1821
  OR (SE) 1.41 (0.08) 1.58 (0.12) 1.52 (0.10)
 No. flares in past year, n = 1821
  IRR (SE) 1.13 (0.02) 1.16 (0.03) 1.17 (0.03)
 Disease Progression, n = 2000
  OR (SE) 1.41 (0.07) 1.56 (0.11) 1.48 (0.10)
PROs
 EQ-5D index, n = 860
  Score (SE) −0.016 (0.003) −0.021 (0.004) −0.020 (0.003)
 EQ-5D VAS, n = 870
  Score (SE) −1.748 (0.283) −2.363 (0.374) −2.248 (0.358)
 WPAI, n = 382
  Score (SE) 5.175 (0.745) 6.913 (1.006) 6.940 (0.888)
 SIBDQ, n = 849
  Score (SE) −2.105 (0.221) −2.817 (0.299) −2.728 (0.273)

Disease Progression: physician-perceived worsening of disease progression (order of responses: improving, stable, and deteriorating). The table shows the increase or decrease in the odds ratio, incidence rate ratio, or mean score with a change in Mayo Score of 1 unit.

EQ-5D, EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire, cross-walked to the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level questionnaire; IRR, incidence rate ratio; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.