Table 5 A.
OptiSafe GHS NC vs. Rest. B. Updated OptiSafe GHS NC vs. Rest. C. OptiSafe GHS Cat. 1 vs. Rest. D. Updated OptiSafe GHS Cat. 1 vs. Rest.
| GHS NC vs. Rest | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| A. OptiSafe |
B. Updated OptiSafe |
||
| Statistic | OptiSafe | Statistic | Updated OptiSafe |
| Sensitivity | 100.0% (88/88) | Sensitivity | 100.0% (89/89) |
| Specificity | 62.5% (30/48) | Specificity | 79.6% (39/49) |
| FN Rate | 0.0% (0/88) | FN Rate | 0.0% (0/89) |
| FP Rate | 37.5% (18/48) | FP Rate | 20.4% (10/49) |
| Accuracy | 86.8% (118/136) | Accuracy | 92.8% (128/138) |
| Bal. Accuracy | 81.3% | Bal. Accuracy | 89.8% |
| GHS Cat.1 vs Rest | |||
| C. OptiSafe |
D. Updated OptiSafe |
||
| Statistic | OptiSafe | Statistic | Updated OptiSafe |
|
| |||
| Sensitivity | 82.2% (37/45) | Sensitivity | 91.7% (44/48) |
| Specificity | 67.9% (55/81) | Specificity | 71.8% (56/78) |
| FN Rate | 17.8% (8/45) | FN Rate | 8.3% (4/48) |
| FP Rate | 32.1% (26/81) | FP Rate 28.2% (22/78) | |
| Accuracy | 73.0% (92/126) | Accuracy | 79.4% (100/126) |
| Bal. Accuracy | 75.1% | Bal. Accuracy | 81.8% |
Cat. = Category; FN Rate = False-negative rate; FP Rate = False-positive rate; Bal. Acc. = Balanced Accuracy; NC = Not classified. Table 4 explains the differences in n. GHS NC versus the rest used 2/1 predictions and GHS NC versus the rest does not use 2/1 predictions. See text for details.