Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 30;12:22578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26265-0

Table 5.

Inversion results of the field magnetic anomalies using BMO and PSO without and with the implementation of the SMA technique.

Chromite Ore, Tangarparha, Odisha, India
Without the implementation of the SMA technique
Parameter set Search spaces PSO results BMO results
K (nT × m2q−2) − 124.88 ~ − 41.626/230.91 ~ 692.74/− 150.15 ~ − 50.05 − 89.911 ± 0/532.39 ± 33.388/− 108.11 ± 0 − 83.456 ± 0.5482/460.69 ± 3.0421/− 100.35 ± 0.6592
θ (degree) 80.154 ~ 240.46/0 ~ 0/1.2652 ~ 3.7957 156.14 ± 0.8431/0 ± 0/2.7927 ± 0.7742 158.86 ± 1.115/0 ± 0/2.5077 ± 0.017604
x0 (m) 24.259 ~ 72.777/477.53 ~ 1432.6/494.74 ~ 1484.2 49.481 ± 0.9878/841.03 ± 56.92/1081.3 ± 317.91 48.976 ± 0.1202/964.07 ± 2.3662/998.81 ± 2.4534
z0 (m) 112.4 ~ 337.21/254.18 ~ 762.53/103.96 ~ 311.89 181.3 ± 27.483/457.75 ± 129.73/272.66 ± 2.5461 224.57 ± 1.906/507.82 ± 4.3115/207.7 ± 1.7627
q 1.213 ~ 3.6391/1.2523 ~ 3.757/1.1962 ~ 3.588 2.4537 ± 0.0038/2.5574 ± 0.0048/2.8354 ± 0.0289 2.43 ± 0.0042/2.5087 ± 0.0043/2.3961 ± 0.0042
RMSE between the observed magnetic anomaly and the obtained residual responses 82.0409 ± 0.9173 29.6877 ± 0.6917
With the implementation of the SMA technique (the mean output of various dx)
K (nT × m2q−2) − 83.42 ± 0.2328/508.09 ± 1.3828/− 100.18 ± 0.2201
θ (degree) 160 ± 0.4774/0 ± 0/1.2748 ± 0.0046261
x0 (m) 38.92 ± 0.12763/968.77 ± 3.514/993.73 ± 3.3938
z0 (m) 320.11 ± 1.6701/540.34 ± 2.2061/247.09 ± 1.1117
q 2.4318 ± 0.0187/2.5016 ± 0.0195/2.3785 ± 0.0197
RMSE between the calculated SMA magnetic anomalies and the inverted one 4.2777 ± 0.0010
Uranium Ore, Beldih Mine, Purulia, West Bengal, India
Without the implementation of the SMA technique
K (nT × m2q−2) 500.71 ~ 1502.1/1887 ~ 5660.9/761.75 ~ 2285.2 1072.1 ± 174.09/3614.6 ± 1287.4/1934.5 ± 293.66 1018.1 ± 1.5033/3836.9 ± 5.7627/1548.9 ± 2.2656
θ (degree) 18.261 ~ 54.783/30.131 ~ 90.393/− 1.8007 ~ − 0.600 40.125 ± 3.3586/61.178 ± 24.724/− 1.1525 ± 0 36.585 ± 0.0702/60.365 ± 0.1153/− 1.1984 ± 0.0023
x0 (m) 55.468 ~ 166.4/83.652 ~ 250.96/129.37 ~ 388.11 98.389 ± 26.253/165.61 ± 12.337/221.96 ± 53.706 110.61 ± 0.2385/166.81 ± 0.3524/257.97 ± 0.5643
z0 (m) 6.97 ~ 20.91/16.086 ~ 48.258/5.8273 ~ 17.482 15.849 ± 5.9752/44.571 ± 2.4841/7.459 ± 0 13.957 ± 0.2744/32.21 ± 0.6317/11.669 ± 0.22926
q 0.4635 ~ 1.3908/0.5155 ~ 1.5466/0.57816 ~ 1.7345 1.0296 ± 0.15337/1.0319 ± 0.0465/1.3087 ± 0.0335 0.9303 ± 0.0010/1.0346 ± 0.0012/1.1602 ± 0.00125
RMSE between the observed magnetic anomaly and the obtained residual responses 262.6028 ± 63.7970 119.7986 ± 2.7188
With the implementation of SMA technique (the mean output of various dx)
K (nT × m2q−2) 1135.2 ± 5.4598/4474.1 ± 32.224/1402.1 ± 7.4276
θ (degree) 32.261 ± 0.1291/55.003 ± 0.1336/− 0.8413 ± 0.0025
x0 (m) 111.21 ± 0.1963/168.96 ± 0.5606/259.28 ± 1.4854
z0 (m) 13.646 ± 0.0696/33.115 ± 0.1668/11.665 ± 0.0575
q 0.9786 ± 0.0012/1.0582 ± 0.0046/1.1005 ± 0.0036
RMSE between the calculated SMA magnetic anomalies and the inverted one 41.0148 ± 0.1821
Mesozoic dyke anomaly, Brazil
Without the implementation of the SMA technique
K (nT × m2q−2) − 2003.3 ~ − 1078.7 − 1195.3461 ± 160.9861 − 1518.7165 ± 4.3658
θ (degree) 41.468 ~ 77.012 41.7885 ± 0.1377 36.0851 ± 0.1544
x0 (m) 0.399 ~ 0.741 0.6333 ± 0.0131 0.6598 ± 0.0590
z0 (m) 2.429 ~ 4.511 4.5077 ± 0.0025 5.7835 ± 0.0166
q 1.4 ~ 2.6 2.0248 ± 0.0348 1.9700 ± 0.0030
RMSE between the observed magnetic anomaly and the obtained residual responses 7.8110 ± 0.0174 4.7079 ± 0.0442
With the implementation of the SMA technique (the mean output of various dx)
K (nT × m2q−2) − 1531.4377 ± 84.6412
θ (degree) 32.3969 ± 0.8404
x0 (m) 0.84221 ± 0.0061
z0 (m) 5.2524 ± 0.0488
q 2.1250 ± 0.0342
RMSE between the calculated SMA magnetic anomalies and the inverted one 1.0191 ± 0.0001

Significant values are in bold.