Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 17;1517(1):300–313. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14877

TABLE 4.

Regression analyses showing MCH and MCV as predictors of ERPs (P1, N1, P2, and P3) mean amplitude for switch and non‐switch stimuli at frontal and posterior‐parietal scalp locations, after controlling for gender

Switch condition Non‐switch condition
Cumulative Simultaneous Cumulative Simultaneous
Variable (Step 2) R 2 change F change β p R 2 change F change β p
P1‐Frontal
MCH 0.08 F (1,102) = 8.51 0.28 0.004 0.06 F (1,102) = 6.45 0.25 0.013
MCV 0.04 F (1,101) = 4.70 0.21 0.033 0.01 F (1,101) = 1.15 0.10 N.S.
P1‐Posterior‐parietal
MCH 0.04 F (1,102) = 4.72 −0.21 0.032 0.04 F (1,102) = 4.16 −0.20 0.044
MCV 0.04 F (1,101) = 4.14 −0.20 0.045 0.01 F (1,101) = 1.13 −0.11 N.S.
N1‐Frontal
MCH 0.10 F (1,102) = 11.18 0.31 0.001 0.10 F (1,102) = 11.23 0.32 0.001
MCV 0.05 F (1,101) = 4.94 0.22 0.028 0.00 F (1,101) = 0.32 0.05 N.S.
N1‐Posterior‐parietal
MCH 0.07 F (1,102) = 7.15 −0.26 0.009 0.07 F (1,102) = 8.05 −0.27 0.006
MCV 0.04 F (1,101) = 4.08 −0.20 0.046 0.02 F (1,101) = 1.54 −0.12 N.S.
P2‐Frontal
MCH 0.07 F (1,102) = 7.48 0.26 0.007 0.04 F (1,102) = 4.51 0.21 0.036
MCV 0.05 F (1,101) = 5.21 0.22 0.025 0.00 F (1,101) = 0.02 0.01 N.S.
P2‐Posterior‐parietal
MCH 0.06 F (1,102) = 5.95 −0.23 0.016 0.02 F (1,102) = 1.58 −0.12 N.S.
MCV 0.06 F (1,101) = 6.05 −0.24 0.016 0.04 F (1,101) = 3.81 −0.19 N.S.
P3‐Frontal
MCH 0.07 F (1,102) = 6.66 0.25 0.011 0.05 F (1,102) = 5.15 0.22 0.025
MCV 0.04 F (1,101) = 4.15 0.20 0.044 0.03 F (1,101) = 3.47 0.18 N.S.
P3‐Posterior‐parietal
MCH 0.04 F (1,102) = 3.50 −0.18 N.S. 0.02 F (1,102) = 2.38 −0.15 N.S.
MCV 0.04 F (1,101) = 3.95 −0.20 0.05 0.02 F (1,101) = 2.48 −0.16 N.S.

Note: Gender was not found as a significant predictor of ERPs amplitude in any of the regression analyses performed; therefore, the results of “step 1” are not shown in Table 4.