TABLE 3.
Publication (first author, year, citation, article title) | Teaching methods or behavioral interventions | Results | Author conclusions |
---|---|---|---|
Gysels M (2004) 54 UK Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: A systematic review of training methods |
Teaching methods: instruction, modeling, role‐play, feedback, and discussion Interventions: interventions for training in communication skills were characterized by the variety of communication approaches used and a diversity of methods |
No. of included studies: 16 studies No meta‐analysis was performed Communication training was mostly provided by a combination of cognitive and experiential elements Studies with the aim of enhancing objective communication skills achieved positive outcomes 3 studies found that the interventions failed to change clinical practice unless behavioral components were integrated Duration of training, content, teaching methods, constellation, and number of participants and timing of the training in the course of a career in clinical oncology should be considered when developing communication programs The risk of bias was not assessed |
Learner‐centered programs using several methods combining a didactic component focusing on theoretical knowledge with practical rehearsal and constructive feedback from peers and skilled facilitators proved to be effective. The best results are expected when the training is carried out over a longer period of time. Small groups encouraged more intense participation. Training in communication for medical students, nursing students, and health professionals is advisable |
Lindhe Söderlund L (2011) 55 Sweden A systematic review of motivational interviewing training for general health care practitioners |
Training and interventions: MI training provided for general healthcare practitioners who planned to use or were already using MI skills in counseling with patients/clients in general healthcare. Duration of the MI training varied, from a 20‐min video to a 2‐d workshop followed up by another day, that is, a total of 24 h MI was used for alcohol counseling with pregnant women, abuse‐related counseling in general healthcare, smoking counseling, medication adherence, diabetes counseling, weight, diet, and physical activity counseling |
No. of included studies: 11 articles reporting results from 10 studies No meta‐analysis was performed A checklist consisting of 7 questions was constructed by authors to assess the reporting and methodological quality of the included studies. The study design of the individual studies was assessed using the MSSM In studies examining participants' reactions to training using a questionnaire or an interview, participants seemed generally satisfied with the training offered. Participants' MI competence was evaluated favorably Results suggested that MI is best learned in workshops of sufficient duration, incorporating follow‐up sessions or some form of postcourse supervision, by applying MI in routine clinical practice with clients, and by practicing MI on one’s own and with someone else (a hired coach or a colleague) who is more proficient in MI. Tape‐recorded MI sessions and use of coding instruments for learning can be beneficial More high‐quality studies are needed to inform on how to best conduct and evaluate MI training |
Outcomes of MI training to improve client communication and counseling concerning lifestyle‐related issues in general healthcare are generally favorable. More high‐quality research is needed to help identify the best practices for training in MI |
Batt‐Rawden SA (2013) 56 UK, USA Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review |
Teaching methods/ interventions: interventions promoting empathy among medical students such as patient narrative and creative arts interventions, writing, drama, communication skills training, problem‐based learning, interpersonal skills training, patient interview, experiential learning, empathy intervention |
No. of included studies: 18 articles (15 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies) The quality of quantitative studies included was performed using the MERSQI. The mean MERSQI score (possible range 5‐15.5) for the 15 included quantitative studies was 10.13. The lowest score was 6.5, and the highest was 14 Studies included used validated outcome measures including self‐report questionnaires (JSPE, Empathy Tendency Scale, the Empathic Skill Scale, the BEES and the ECRS), observed measures (CARE from the point of view of first‐person patient, SPIR from the point of view of third‐person assessors), as well as nonvalidated, self‐report measures developed by the study investigators 15/18 articles reported a significant increase in empathy It was found that educational interventions can successfully cultivate empathy in undergraduate medical students and that such interventions are well received by participants Studies were limited by common methodological flaws, including lack of control groups, small sample sizes, single institutions, lack of preintervention or baseline measurements, and lack of long‐term follow‐up |
Educational interventions can be successful in maintaining and enhancing empathy in undergraduate medical students. More rigorous research is needed to inform recommendations for medical education |
Abbreviations: BEES, Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale; CARE, Consultation and Relational Empathy; ECRS, Empathy Construct Rating Sca; JSPE, Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy; MERSQI, Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument; MI, motivational interviewing; MSSM, Maryland Scale of Scientific Methods; SPIR, Staff–Patient Interaction Rating Scale.