TABLE 8.

Quotes illustrating unintended negative consequences of public involvement processes

Unintended negative consequences of public involvement processes	Quotes	References
Individual resources required	‘Findings raise concerns about the ability of deliberative procedures to engage all citizens equally […] some vulnerable and disenfranchised groups indicate potential problems with their experiences’. (Goold et al., 2005)	Carlisle et al. (2018), Goold et al. (2005), Khodyakov et al. (2014), Munoz et al. (2013), Myers et al. (2020), Owens et al. (2010), Serapioni and Duxbury (2012), Yankeelov et al. (2019)
Influence uncertainty	‘…a significant number of users’ spokespersons showed a tendency to problematise the relationship with the decision‐makers, citing the limited impact of their proposals and recommendations’ (Serapioni & Duxbury, 2012).	Gold et al. (2005), Iyer et al. (2015), Khodyakov et al. (2014), Munoz et al. (2013), Muurinen (2019), Owens et al. (2010), Serapioni and Duxbury (2012), Timotijevic and Raats (2007), Valaitis et al. (2019), Wainwright et al. (2014), Woods (2009)
Power differences	‘…decision‐making power ultimately resides with the provider’. (Wainwright et al., 2014)	Farmer and Nimegeer (2014), Iyer et al. (2015), Morain et al. (2017), Munoz et al. (2013), Myers et al. (2020), Owens et al. (2010), Timotjevic and Raats (2007), Uding et al. (2009), Valaitis et al. (2019), Wainwright et al. (2014), Woods (2009), Yankeelov et al. (2019)