Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 17;77(12):1395–1415. doi: 10.1111/anae.15817

Table 1.

Potential factors contributing to unrecognised oesophageal intubation. An expanded version of this table is available at https://www.UniversalAirway.org/puoi.

Occurrence of oesophageal intubation
Misidentification of larynx
  • Limited operator expertise/Inadequate supervision

  • Practitioner complacency

  • Compromised performance

  • Compromised laryngeal view

  • Distorted glottic anatomy

  • Glottic impersonation

  • Equipment issues

Delivery issue
  • Tube, introducer or bronchoscope not passed into trachea or displaced during railroading

  • Blind intubation via supraglottic airway

Movement after successful tracheal placement
  • Withdrawal of bougie, stylet or flexible bronchoscope

  • Subsequent airway instrumentation

  • Patient coughing or moving

  • Chest compressions

  • Changes in patient position

  • Paediatric patients

  • Poorly secured tube

Failure to recognise oesophageal intubation *
CO 2 detection not available/used/functioning
Failure to confirm CO 2 detection
Spurious CO 2 detection
  • False‐positive CO2 detection using colorimetry

  • CO2 detection in association with oesophageal intubation

Misinterpretation of monitoring display:
  • Confusion of airway pressure waveform with capnography waveform

Failure to acknowledge the potential for absence of sustained exhaled CO 2 to indicate oesophageal intubation.
  • Cognitive biases

  • Knowledge deficits

  • Communication deficits

*

Many of these may be a consequence of, or aggravated by, stress and suboptimal teamwork.