Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 4;24(9):1467–1477. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2612

Table 3.

Consensus statements and levels of agreement displayed by country: correction of hyperkalaemia for at‐risk cardiorenal patients with the potassium‐lowering therapy (Topic C)

No. Statement Agreement (%)
All CA DE ES FR IT UK US
20 A reduction in emergency department visits and unplanned hospitalizations due to complications associated with hyperkalaemia should be a goal of good management 96 96 94 100 94 91 98 97
21 A goal for the management of high‐risk cardiorenal patients should be to utilize the maximum recommended dose of RAASi therapy 94 92 89 89 96 88 98 97
22 RAASi‐induced hyperkalaemia should not be considered intolerance until other strategies to reduce K+ have been exhausted 93 92 91 96 94 91 96 91
23 De‐escalation or discontinuation of RAASi therapy is associated with worse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in cardiorenal patients 94 92 91 96 94 84 100 95
24 Permanent discontinuation of a RAASi should only be considered as a last resort strategy for chronic hyperkalaemia 92 94 87 88 98 95 96 92
25 Hyperkalaemia should no longer be seen as a barrier to optimization of guideline‐directed therapy 88 88 93 91 96 88 82 87
26 Novel K+ binders enable guideline‐recommended RAASi dosing and the proven benefits that this brings to patients 92 90 91 89 90 95 94 93
27 Use of novel K+ binders in patients with mild hyperkalaemia can enable guideline‐recommended doses of RAASi therapy 94 90 93 98 94 100 92 94
28 RAASi use should not be de‐escalated or discontinued due to hyperkalaemia unless alternative measures of hyperkalaemia management have been optimized, including initiation of K+ binder therapy 92 94 94 95 92 91 90 91
29 Novel K+ binders can enable optimization of RAASi therapy in a similar way that antiemetics can enable optimization of chemotherapy 90 84 89 88 94 93 88 91
30 Novel K+ binders should not need to show mortality benefit; they enable RAASis, which have an already proven mortality benefit 82 86 74 79 86 86 86 80
31 The use of SPS should be avoided due to concerns with GI toxicity, low compliance due to poor palatability, and is only indicated in severely oliguric or anuric patients 77 60 69 68 66 86 92 82
32 SPS should not be used in the medium‐ or long‐term as it may cause severe GI side effects, including bowel necrosis 82 76 81 75 70 86 90 86

CA, Canada; DE, Germany; ES, Spain; FR, France; GI, gastrointestinal; IT, Italy; K+, potassium; RAASi, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor; SPS, sodium polystyrene sulfonate; UK, United Kingdom; US, United States of America.