. 2022 Aug 10;63(10):1196–1205. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13664

Table 2.

Decomposition of best‐model components based on exposomic subdomains

Proximal contextual (k = 36)

Broader contextual (k = 49)

Life events (k = 48)

INT

σ_{G}^{2}

0.053 (−0.085, 0.191)

0.060 (−0.087, 0.206) ^b

0.055 (−0.08, 0.189)

σ_{E}^{2}

0.079 (0.039, 0.119) ^a

0.029 (0.013, 0.045) ^a

0.108 (0.06, 0.155) ^a ^, ^b

σ_{G \times E}^{2}

0.129 (0.058, 0.198) ^a ^, ^b

−0.012 (−0.04, 0.016)

0.119 (0.061, 0.176) ^a

EXT

σ_{G}^{2}

0.079 (−0.044, 0.201)

0.167 (0.019, 0.316) ^a ^, ^b

0.134 (0, 0.268)

σ_{E}^{2}

0.163 (0.084, 0.242) ^a ^, ^b

0.045 (0.023, 0.067) ^a

0.112 (0.062, 0.161) ^a

σ_{G \times E}^{2}

0.280 (0.21, 0.35) ^a ^, ^b

0.038 (−0.026, 0.102)

0.199 (0.138, 0.258) ^a

σ ² = variance components reflect proportions of total variance estimated by the model; residual (e) components not shown.

^{^a}

Nonzero overlapping 95% confidence interval.

^{^b}

Largest variance explained by that component (row‐wise) across the three exposomic subdomains: Proximal contextual = E comprising 36 friends/caregiver/family/school variables; Broader contextual = E comprising 49 neighborhood/area‐level variables; Life events = E comprising 48 life event variables.