Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;27(10):881–890. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13812

TABLE 2.

Decision tree model parameters for the main analysis

Parameter Value Data source
Number of primary care facilities, n 32 [18]
Percentage of patients with ARI who have LRTI, % 1.1; see Table 1 for age‐stratified values [18]
Percentage of patients with LRTI who have severe disease, % 8 [13]
Percentage of patients with severe LRTI correctly diagnosed without pulse oximetry, % 60 [20]
Percentage of patients with severe LRTI correctly diagnosed with pulse oximetry, % 80 Adapted from [13]
Percentage of patients with non‐severe LRTI incorrectly diagnosed with severe LRTI without pulse oximetry, % 25 Assumed
Percentage of patients with non‐severe LRTI incorrectly diagnosed with severe LRTI with pulse oximetry, % 10 Assumed
Percentage of patients with URTI treated with antibiotics without pulse oximetry, % 36.5; see Table 1 for age‐stratified values [18]
Relative reduction in antibiotic prescription with pulse oximetry and clinical guideline retraining, % 50 [16]
Percentage of patients with severe LRTI diagnosed without pulse oximetry who recover without hospital admission, % 65 [21]
Relative increase in recovery without hospital admission in patients with severe LRTI diagnosed with pulse oximetry, % 10 Assumed
Percentage of patients with severe LRTI who re‐present who go to hospital, % 100 Assumed
Percentage of patients initially diagnosed with severe LRTI who go to hospital, % 80 [22]
Percentage of patients with non‐severe LRTI incorrectly diagnosed as severe who go to hospital, % 75 Assumed
Percentage of in‐hospital deaths of patients correctly diagnosed with severe LRTI without pulse oximetry, % 10 [22, 23]
Relative reduction in in‐hospital deaths of patients correctly diagnosed with severe LRTI with pulse oximetry, % 20 [24, 25]
Percentage of in‐hospital deaths of patients with severe LRTI incorrectly diagnosed as non‐severe without pulse oximetry who re‐present, % 10 [22, 23]
Relative reduction in in‐hospital deaths of patients with severe LRTI incorrectly diagnosed as non‐severe with pulse oximetry who re‐present, % 20 [24, 25]
Median hospital LOS of patients with severe LRTI diagnosed without pulse oximetry and of re‐presentations with severe LRTI, days 5.34 Medical Records Department, Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital (personal communication, 21 September 2021)
Median LOS of hospitalised patients with severe LRTI correctly diagnosed with pulse oximetry, days 4.01 Assumed at 75% of median LOS
Median LOS of hospitalised patients with non‐severe LRTI incorrectly diagnosed as severe with pulse oximetry, days 2.67 Assumed at 50% of median LOS
Purchase cost of one pulse oximeter (includes one each of universal, paediatric, and neonatal probes), US$ 275 [19, 26]
Maintenance cost of one pulse oximeter per year (includes replacement probes and batteries), US$ 55 [19, 27]
Cost of district‐wide staff training per year (initial training plus two refreshers) and monitoring at 0.2 primary health worker FTE, US$ 1324.75 Chiang Rai Provincial Public Health Office (personal communication, 2 August 2022) [14],
Cost of extra staff time per primary care unit per year at 0.05 primary health worker FTE, US$ 331.19 Chiang Rai Provincial Public Health Office (personal communication, 2 August 2022)
Cost of one course of amoxicillin, US$ 0.61 for children <5 years, 0.91 for children 5–14 years, 1.21 for adults [28]
Cost of antimicrobial resistance associated with one course of amoxicillin, US$ 11.80 [29]
Cost of one occupied bed‐day at provincial hospital, US$ 658.46 Finance Department, Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital (personal communication, 21 September 2021)

Note: Parameters apply to all age groups unless explicitly stated. Costs were adjusted for inflation and expressed in US dollars as at 1 August 2021.

Abbreviations: FTE, full‐time equivalent; LOS, length of stay; LRTI, lower respiratory tract infection; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection.