Table 4.
Technology | Variation Type | Merits | Demerits | Fetal Diseases | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISH | Chromosome multicopy | Simple operation; | Fetal origin identification is | T13/T18/T21 | [39] |
number variation | Fetal origin identification |
applicable to male fetuses; Male fetuses |
|||
Results are influenced by cell | |||||
purity | |||||
STR | Chromosome multicopy | Fetal origin identification; | Fetal origin identification is more | T18/T21 | [187, 189, 190] |
number variation | Not limited to male fetuses; | complex | |||
High sensitivity | |||||
PCR | SNVs | High sensitivity; | High demanding; | Sickle cell anemia; | [40] |
High specificity; | Prone to false positives | ABO blood group; | [28] | ||
Simple and fast | T18/T21 | [194] | |||
ACGH | CNVs of genes | High resolution; | Detection of some unknown | T13/T18/T21; | [39, 201] |
(Chromosomal multi-copy | Without culture; | significance of CNVs | Rearrangement variants | [198] | |
Number, variation, | |||||
microdeletions, | |||||
microduplications,SVs) | |||||
Chromosomally | |||||
unbalanced variants | |||||
NGS | CNVs of whole genes | High-throughput; | High cost; | T18/T21/MMS; | [42, 212] |
Chromosomally | Comprehensive Analysis | Detection of some unknown | Congenital | [41] | |
balanced variants | significance of CNVs | Deafness | |||
WGS | CNVs of whole genes | High-throughput; | High cost; | Single gene | [222] |
(SNVs/In Dels/CNVs/SVs) | More comprehensive | Detection of some unknown | disease | ||
genetic information | significance of CNVs; | ||||
Low coverage will miss variants | |||||
WES | CNVs of whole exon genes | High-throughput; | High cost; | 13/18/21 | [30] |
(SNVs/In Dels/CNVs/SVs) | Small sequencing range | Detection of SNVs is not as | 18q21s | ||
reliable as WGS | microdeletion |