Table 1.
Site model | LRT | 2∆l | df | p-value | l | ω | BEBs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M0 (one-ratio) | M0 vs. M3 | 262.398852 | 4 | << 0.001 | − 3598.034542 | 0.0718 | – |
M3 (discrete) | − 3466.835116 | 0.1439 | |||||
M1a (nearly Neutral) | M1a vs. M2a | 11.558380 | 2 | 0.003 | − 3480.993265 | 0.1328 | – |
M2a (positive selection) | − 3475.214075 | 0.1815 | |||||
M7 (β) | M7 vs. M8 | 21.480488 | 2 | << 0.001 | − 3477.904393 | 0.1108 | – |
M8 (β & ω) | − 3467.164149 | 0.1450 | |||||
M8a (β & ω = 1) | M8a vs. M8 | 31.89007 | 1 | << 0.001 | − 3483.109184 | 0.0769 | 10*; 38*; 249**; 256*; 286*; 292** |
Underlying phylogeny is based on the ITS1 (532 bp) of B. calyciflorus s.s., B. fernandoi, B. angularis, B. diversicornis and B. rubens. For each likelihood ratio test (LRT), we provide log likelihood (l) values of the compared tests (2∆l), degrees of freedom (df), p-values, estimated average ratio of non-synonymous vs. synonymous substitutions (ω), and the sites inferred to be under positive selection by Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis, labeled with an * for a posterior probability of > 95% and ** for > 99%.