Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis of Hcy in relation to CKD risk
| Variable | Male | P value | Female | P value | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | P value | |||
| Hcy | ||||||
| Model 1 | 1.26(1.18 ~ 1.34) | < 0.001 | 1.2 (1.14 ~ 1.27) | < 0.001 | 1.23(1.18 ~ 1.29) | < 0.001 |
| Mode 2 | 1.22(1.15 ~ 1.3) | < 0.001 | 1.17(1.11 ~ 1.24) | < 0.001 | 1.2 (1.15 ~ 1.25) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.18(1.1 ~ 1.27) | < 0.001 | 1.15(1.08 ~ 1.23) | < 0.001 | 1.17(1.11 ~ 1.22) | < 0.001 |
The data are presented as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) and P values. Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age and race; Model 3: adjusted for age, race, HbA1c, ALB, CHO, TG, and UA