Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 2;13(2):595–608. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00876-x

Table 2.

Primary and key secondary outcomes ITT population

Endpoint n Responders, % (95% CI) Adjusted % difference (95% CI) Nominal P value
EASI 75 at week 16
 Placebo 34 11.8% (0.9–22.6%)
 Risankizumab 150 mg 69 24.6% (14.5–34.8%) 13.0% (–1.7 to 27.7%) 0.084
 Risankizumab 300 mg 69 21.7% (12.0–31.5%) 10.0% (–4.6 to 24.6%) 0.179
vIGA-AD 0/1 with ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline at week 16
 Placebo 34 5.9% (0.0–13.8%)
 Risankizumab 150 mg 69 14.5% (6.2–22.8%) 8.7% (–2.5 to 20.0%) 0.129
 Risankizumab 300 mg 69 5.8% (0.3–11.3%) 0.0% (–9.4 to 9.4%) 0.994
WP-NRS with ≥ 4-point reduction from baseline at week 16
 Placebo 33 0.0
 Risankizumab 150 mg 66 13.6% (5.4–21.9%) 13.7% (5.4–22.1%) 0.001
 Risankizumab 300 mg 66 15.2% (6.5–23.8%) 15.3% (6.6–24.0%)  < 0.001

EASI 75 ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index, ITT intent to treat, vIGA-AD Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis, WP-NRS Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale