Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 20;12(6):869–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2022.09.001

Table 1.

Comparison of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 and 68Ga-NODA-CDV-Nb109.

Analytes Labeling method Homogeneous structure RCY (%) RCP (%) Molar activity (GBq/mol) RCP of probe in serum for 2 h (%) RCP of probe in PBS for 2 h (%) Maximum tumor uptake of A375-hPD-L1 (%ID/mL) Maximum tumor uptake of U87 (%ID/mL) Maximum T/M ratio in A375-hPD-L1 Maximum T/M ratio in U87 Refs.
68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 Random No >95 >98 25.17 ± 3.26 >90 >90 5.32 ± 0.47 2.84 ± 0.32 11.03 9.12 [29,42]
68Ga-NODA-CDV-Nb109 Site-specific Yes >95 >97 26.17 ± 3.32 >90 >90 4.99 ± 0.42 3.01 ± 0.52 5.84 4.40 This work

CDV: cysteine, aspartic acid, and valine; RCY: radiochemical yield; RCP: radiochemical purity; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; T/M: tumor-to-muscle.