Table 1.
Authors | Study design | Mean age | Male % | Mean follow-up, mo | Study quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ayres et al 9 | Retrospective case series | 52 | Not reported | 14 | 7 |
Büchler and Aiken 10 | Retrospective case series | 37 | 94 | 15 | 8 |
Burton et al 11 | Retrospective case series | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 10 |
Granowitz and Vainio 12 | Retrospective case series | 41 | 17 | 50 | 9 |
Khuri 13 | Retrospective case series | 52 | 50 | 8 | 6 |
Leibovic and Strickland 4 | Retrospective comparative series | 49 | Not reported | Not reported | 17 |
Leonard and Capen 14 | Retrospective case series | Not reported | 62 | Not reported | 4 |
McGlynn et al 15 | Retrospective case series | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 6 |
Novoa-Parra et al 16 | Retrospective case series | 60 | 100 | 20 | 10 |
Sabbagh et al 17 | Retrospective case series | 54 | Not reported | 72 | 7 |
Seitz et al 18 | Retrospective case series | 54 | 71 | Not reported | 5 |
Tan et al 19 | Retrospective case series | 48 | Not reported | 8 | 11 |
Wright and McMurtry 20 | Retrospective case series | 49 | Not reported | 48 | 9 |
Lewis et al 21 | Retrospective case series | 51 | Not reported | 6 | 4 |
Potenza 22 | Retrospective case series | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 2 |
Note. Study quality was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies scoring system.