Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 15;47:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.005

Table 2.

Unadjusted relation between recurrence and patient, treatment, and tumour characteristics

No recurrence Recurrence HR (95% CI) p value
n (%) 90 (39) 138 (61)
Age, median (IQR) 65 (59–73) 64 (55–70) 0.98 (0.96–1.0) 0.02
Characteristics known before pelvic treatment
Treatment period, n (%)
 1969–1987 3 (33) 6 (67) 0.95 (0.37–2.5) 0.92
 1988–1993 9 (69) 4 (31) 0.27 (0.08–0.91) 0.03
 1994–2000 11 (37) 19 (63) 0.93 (0.51–1.7) 0.81
 2001–2012 56 (40) 83 (60) 0.75 (0.48–1.2) 0.19
 2013–2016 11 (30) 26 (70) Ref
Moment of treatment, n (%)
 First treatment 59 (38) 95 (62) Ref
 Recurrence treatment 31 (42) 43 (58) 0.89 (0.62–1.3) 0.56
Main treatment modality, n (%)
 Chemoradiation 7 (30) 16 (70) Ref
 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 15 (41) 22 (59) 0.71 (0.37–1.4) 0.32
 Prophylactic PLND 56 (39) 86 (61) 0.80 (0.47–1.4) 0.43
 Therapeutic PLND 10 (42) 14 (58) 0.84 (0.41–1.7) 0.63
Suspicious pelvic nodes on imaging, n (%)
 None 19 (40) 28 (60) Ref
 Unilateral 10 (22) 35 (78) 1.6 (0.97–2.6) 0.067
 Bilateral 9 (45) 11 (55) 0.89 (0.43–1.8) 0.75
Characteristics known after pelvic treatment
Adjuvant radiotherapy, n (%)
 No 71 (44) 92 (56) Ref
 Yes 11 (27) 30 (73) 1.3 (0.86–2.0) 0.21
Differentiation, n (%)
 Good 15 (44) 19 (56) Ref
 Intermediate 44 (43) 58 (57) 1.1 (0.62–1.8) 0.83
 Poor 23 (30) 54 (70) 1.4 (0.80–2.4) 0.25
Pathological N stage, n (%)
 pN0 4 (100) 0 (0)
 pN1 13 (87) 2 (13) 0.10 (0.03–0.42) 0.002
 pN2 18 (64) 10 (36) 0.28 (0.14–0.57) <0.001
 pN3 33 (27) 88 (73) Ref
 pNx 22 (37) 38 (63) 0.72 (0.49–1.1) 0.11
Pathology pelvic nodes, n (%)
 Negative 66 (55) 54 (45) Ref
 Positive 15 (21) 58 (79) 2.7 (1.8–3.9) <0.001
ENE, n (%)
 Absent 51 (61) 32 (39) Ref
 Present 35 (28) 88 (72) 2.6 (1.7–4.0) <0.001

CI = confidence interval; HR = Hazard ratio; IQR = interquartile range; PLND = pelvic lymph node dissection; ENE = extranodal extension; Ref = reference.