TABLE 1.
Study | Participants Period of study | Main outcome studied | Main finding | Topic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ayala et al. [5] | 96 male professional players, 1 season | Hamstring strain injuries predicted | The prediction model showed moderate to high accuracy | Injury risk/Injury occurrence prediction |
| ||||
Oliver et al. [18] | 355 elite youth players aged 10–18 years old, 1 season | Injuries predicted | The best performing decision tree model provided a specificity of 74.2% and sensitivity of 55.6% with an AUC of 0.663 | |
| ||||
Rossi et al. [17] | 26 professional male players, 1 season | Non-contact injuries | Machine learning technique can detect around 80% of the injuries with about 50% precision, far better than the baselines and state-of-the-art injury risk estimation techniques | |
| ||||
Rommers et al. [7] | 734 players, under-10 to under-15 age categories, 1 season | Non-contact injuries | Machine learning algorithm was able to identify the injured players in the hold-out test sample with 85% precision, 85% recall (sensitivity) and 85% accuracy | |
| ||||
Bongiovanni et al. [35] | 16 male under-15 team players, 1 season | Sprint CoD, CMJ & aerobic fitness performance prediction | Anthropometric features were predictors of sprint performance and aerobic fitness, not CoD and CMJ | Physical performance prediction |
| ||||
Campbell et al. [29] | As the authors state "The data encompassed multiple seasons (2013–2018)and was pooled across pre-season and in-season training sessions” without including information on the data size. | Internal (sRPE) and external load (total distance covered) | Very low predictive ability | Players’ monitoring |
| ||||
Geurkink et al. [28] | 46 elite male players, 61 training sessions, 913 observations | Predicted sRPE | sRPE was predicted accurately | |
| ||||
Jaspers et al. [27] | 38 professional male players, 2 seasons | External and internal training load | More accurate predictions of training Rate of Perceived Exertion from external workload data in combination with pre-session wellness | |
| ||||
Op De Beéck et al. [26] | One soccer team (no information for duration of the study) | Future wellness items (i.e., fatigue, sleep quality, general muscle soreness, stress levels, and mood) | Wellness was predicted based on internal and external workload data. Their effect sizes indicate that the external load and internal load, separately and in combination, do not have sufficient predictive ability | |
| ||||
Perri et al. [36] | 28 sub-elite players, 1 season | Wellness index as predicted by internal training load | Machine learning technique predicted the wellness index based on previous training day internal load | |
| ||||
Dick et al. [37] | Tracking data consisting of a sequence of coordinates of all players and the ball for a set of soccer games | Successful attacks | Proposed an approach to learn valuations of multiplayer positioning using positional data | Performance analysis |
| ||||
Goes et al. [23] | Position tracking data of 118 Dutch Eredivisie matches, containing 12424 attacks | Successful attacks | Identified dynamic formations based on position tracking data, and identified dynamic subgroups for every timeframe in a match | |
| ||||
Link and Hoernig [24] | Data from 60 matches in the German Bundesliga, 1 season | Models for detecting individual and team ball possession based on position data | Match event were detected automatically | |
| ||||
Montoliu et al. [25] | Football videos including two regular league matches played by up to four professional teams | Team activity recognition and analysis | The proposed method performed the team activity recognition task with high accuracy | |
| ||||
Wang [8] | Teams playing in UEFA EURO2012 | Technical and tactical analysis of teams | Key performance indicators were identified | |
| ||||
Zago et al. [38] | 13 elite female players performed a shuttle run test, wearing 6-axes inertial sensor at the pelvis level | Prediction of turn direction, speed (before/after turn) and the related positive/negative mechanical work | Good predictive ability of the machine learning algorithms | Movement analysis |
| ||||
Barron et al. [39] | 966 outfield male players, 1 season | Identify key performance indicators that influence player’s career status | Specific technical characteristics correctly predicted 78.8% of the players’ league status with a test error of 8.3% | Player’s career trajectory |
| ||||
Matesanz et al. [40] | Soccer players’ transfer network among 21 European first leagues between the seasons 1996/1997 and 2015/2016 | Table rank, UEFA points | Clubs with the highest transfer spending achieve better performance | Club performance |
| ||||
Sahin and Erol [41] | Data of 236 soccer games, 1 season | Predict the attendance demand in European soccer games | A model was proposed to predict attendance with higher accuracy | Match attendance |
Note: AUC: Area Under the Curve; CoD: change of direction; CMJ: countermovement jump; sRPE: session rating of perceived exertion