Table 1. Results of a hypothetical test validity study.
| a | Gold-standard test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | ||
| T1 | Positive | TP: 85 π Se1 |
FP: 40 (1 – π)(1 – Sp1) |
125 |
| Negative | FN: 15 π (1 – Se1) |
TN: 360 (1 – π) Sp1 |
375 | |
| Total | 100 | 400 | 500 | |
| b | T1 | |||
| Positive | Negative | Total | ||
| T2 | Positive | 107 pr Se2,1 |
104 (1 – pr)(1 – Sp2,1) |
211 |
| Negative | 43 pr (1 – Se2,1) |
346 (1 – pr) Sp2,1 |
389 | |
| Total | 150 | 450 | 600 | |
| c | Gold-standard test | |||
| Positive | Negative | Total | ||
| T2 | Positive | 76 π Se2 |
64 (1 – π)(1 – Sp2) |
140 |
| Negative | 4 π (1 – Se2) |
256 (1 – π) Sp2 |
260 | |
| Total | 80 | 320 | 400 | |
| a) a well-established test, T1, against the gold-standard test; b) a new test, T2, against T1; note that here, the true prevalence, π, is replaced by the apparent prevalence, pr (7) as T1 is not a gold standard; and c) another hypothetical study if T2 would have been tested against the gold standard. TP – True positive. FP – False positive. FN – False negative. TN – True negative. π – True prevalence. pr – Apparent prevalence. Sp – specificity. Se – sensitivity. | ||||