Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 2;25(1):15–28. doi: 10.1007/s11936-022-00973-2

Table 1.

Randomized clinical trials

Study ATTEST [18] Australian TNK trial [19] Haley et al. [20] EXTEND-IA TNK [24•] NOR-TEST [23]
Design RCT phase II RCT phase IIB RCT Phase IIB/III Phase III open-label blinded endpoint RCT Phase III open-label blinded endpoint RCT
Inclusion criteria Supratentorial AIS

CTP: penumbra ≥ 20% core + 

CTA occlusion

AIS < 3 h Evidence of proximal LVO on CTA + eligible for EVT Clinically suspected AIS with measurable deficit on NIHSS + eligible for EVT
N 104 75 112 202 1100
TNK dose (mg/kg) (n) 0.25 (n = 52)

0.1 (n = 25)

0.25 (n = 25)

0.1 (n = 31)

0.25 (n = 31)

0.4 (n = 19)

0.25 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg
Treatment window 4.5 h 6 h 3 h  < 4.5 h from LKW  < 4.5 h from LKW or from Awakening
Imaging selection NCCT CTP and CTA NCCT CTA/CTP: perfusion mismatch for anterior circulation strokes on CTP; ratio of > 1.2, absolute difference in volume > 10 ml, ischemic core volume < 70 ml *

NCCT for < 4.5 h from LKW

MRI (DWI/FLAIR) mismatch for < 4.5 h from awakening

Primary outcome

Salvaged penumbra

68% TNK p 0.81

68% alteplase

Reperfusion

79.3% TNK p 0.004

55.4% alteplase

NIHSS improvement

8 TNK p < 0.001

3 Alteplase

90 Day mRS

mRS < 2

TNK 0.1 mg/kg: 45.2%

TNK 0.25 mg/kg: 48.4%

Alteplase 0.9 mg/kg: 41.9%

Reperfusion > 50% at time of angiogram OR absence of retrievable thrombus at time of the initial angiogram:

22% TNK vs. 10% Alteplase (P = 0.002 for non-inferiority; P = 0.03 for superiority)

Excellent functional outcome: mRS score 0–1 at 90 days:

64% TNK vs. 63% Alteplase (P = 0.52)

sICH

2% TNK p 0.5

4% alteplase

4% TNK p 0.33

12% alteplase

0% 0.1 mg/kg TNK

6.5% 0.25 mg/kg TNK

8% 0.4 mg/kg TNK

3.2% alteplase

1% in both groups

Any ICH at 24–48 h: 9% for both

sICH at 24–48 h: 3% for TNK

2% for alteplase

Conclusion Outcomes did not differ between groups TNK had better reperfusion rates and clinical outcomes TNK 0.4 mg/kg was discarded as inferior

TNK associated with improved reperfusion and improved functional outcomes

No significant difference in number of patients with no/minimal disability at 90 days (mRS < 2)

Further studies necessary to establish non-inferiority of TNK and safety/efficacy in moderate/severe strokes

*This criterion was removed after ~80 patients enrolled due to analysis from other trials demonstrating benefit in patients with larger ischemic core volumes